English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A.before the president appoint them.
B.after the president appoints them.
C.after they serve for a year
D.both A and C.

2006-10-12 06:25:00 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

Sometimes it seems like A is the right answer, but only when the White House, and Congress are controlled by the same party. Although to the appointees it might seem that when the president appoints them they go on trial.

The correct answer is B.

2006-10-12 06:34:51 · answer #1 · answered by Tony 2 · 1 0

None of the above.

Under the Constitution, Congress only has the role of giving advice and consent. This is very different from requiring "approval". Approval might be construed as requiring a supermajority, but consent implies that all nominees will be approved except in the most extreme circumstances.

Of course, I'm only going by the Constitution, so if the DC newspapers say that Republican appointees have to have unanimous approval of the Senate, I guess that's how it works.

2006-10-12 06:37:06 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 0 1

we've something spoke of as a stability of means in this usa, that's the reason we've 3 distinctive branches on the acceptable of the government bypass chart, the administrative (President), the Legislative (Congress), and the Judicial (Justice branch. this would be a equipment of tests and balances. The Legislative makes the guidelines, the administrative (president) signs and indicators or veotes them, and the Judicial consists of them out. The splendid courtroom comes to a decision in the event that they are Constitutional or no longer, and get carry of an entire life appointment, so their perspectives would be in place for something of their lives. that's the reason one guy, the president who appoints, wouldn't have rather the means over those lifetime appointments and our elected representatives are their to "verify" them out. Do a Google seek for U.S. government stability of means, and you will no longer in basic terms locate this, yet you additionally can locate how this methodology works in different international places and do a assessment which will boost your document to an A, based of direction what grade you're in.

2016-12-26 17:30:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's b after the president appoints him the senate must vote there approval or he's gone.

2006-10-12 07:59:06 · answer #4 · answered by brian L 6 · 0 0

I could be wrong "BUT" I always thought that it was The Senate who approved The Justices after The President made his choice.

2006-10-12 06:36:49 · answer #5 · answered by MSJP 4 · 1 0

The presidents nominates ( does that mean appoint in your book)
they do not take office but after he nominates them, congress approves them, once they are approved they are sworn in.

So you will have to look this up in your school book as to the wording they used

2006-10-12 08:32:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

B

Senate confirms Presidential appointment

2006-10-12 06:33:09 · answer #7 · answered by Larry T 5 · 1 0

E. None of the above.

2006-10-12 06:42:17 · answer #8 · answered by 34th B.G. - USAAF 7 · 0 1

lol b

2006-10-12 06:27:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers