Abortion or genocide? This is a clarifying question in response to my last question (I hope). I hope you guys better understand this one...
2006-10-12 06:09:48 · 14 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Both are bad.
Abstinence is the worst, Trillions of unborn living human sperm and ova babies are murdered ever day because of abstinence.
2006-10-12 06:12:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding me with this question. This has to be a fake question.. sounds like one that I would make up just to see how far gone some people are because I can't imagine you really want someone to compare the two - but to answer your question anyways I would have to go with genocide.
2006-10-12 13:20:36 · answer #2 · answered by katjha2005 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Genocide. Because you are taking a whole group of people and killing them. With abortion, you are ending a pregnancy (in an extremely early stage) that you helped start.
2006-10-12 13:20:10 · answer #3 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Abortion is in no way equivalent to genocide. I've seen those kinds of comparisons on here as well, and it's absurd. They are two entirely different subjects resulting from entirely different circumstances.
2006-10-12 13:21:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean abortion as a choice, then genocide is by far worse.
2006-10-12 13:15:08 · answer #5 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose you want us to think that state approved abortion is tantamount to organized genocide?
2006-10-12 13:13:05 · answer #6 · answered by Brand X 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least in genocide, people can attempt to defend themselves.
2006-10-12 13:19:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some, myself included, consider abortion to be equated with genocide, so they are equally horrible atrocities.
2006-10-12 13:15:12 · answer #8 · answered by Damien104 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I understood the gist of your earlier question...anyway, both are examples of reprehensible human failure; genocide is worse.
2006-10-12 13:14:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think genocide cos they tend to kill ppl on a much much larger scale and it is illegal. the ppl they have killed have lives and mouths to feed and all that.
think bout it if sme1 got their partner, girlfriend or sme1 else pregnant and they cant afford it due to personal reasons then they have to resort to abortion. though i still think the dumb f***s should've used protection..
2006-10-12 13:17:50 · answer #10 · answered by zico 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋