English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Dish is cheaper and I have never been impressed with Direct TV since they bought out Primestar

2006-10-12 06:01:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

8 answers

s e a r c h i n g for signal. I like cable.

I

2006-10-12 06:05:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have used both direct tv and dish network and both are about the same but if i had to choose i would pick direct tv.
i am now using cable which really suck now.

2006-10-12 06:10:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

we've DirecTV w/ interior sight channels, 7 HBOs, 4 Starz! Channels, 8 Encore channels, 5 Showtime channels, 2 TMCs, Flix, Sundance, and IFC, besides because of the fact the fundamentals for seventy 4 funds a month. the disadvantage: If it rains annoying sufficient, our sign is interrupted until eventually the rain shall we up. thankfully, the sign seems to be good sufficient that this would not ensue to oftentimes.

2016-12-16 06:37:08 · answer #3 · answered by casimir 3 · 0 0

Dish sucks...I have it and it isn't that great. They will charge you for every little thing and never upgrade your system. It is constantly going out too! Cold weather, Hot weather, Rain, Snow...everything makes this system go down. And no NFL Football plan. Stay where you are or go Cable.

2006-10-12 06:05:12 · answer #4 · answered by Ron B. 7 · 0 0

i think Direct TV is the best out there

2006-10-12 09:16:13 · answer #5 · answered by Jubei 7 · 0 0

Dish SUCKS!!! We had Direct. It is sooo much better.

2006-10-12 06:04:36 · answer #6 · answered by Death Virus 6 · 0 0

Beats the tar out of me. That's a real head scratcher.

2006-10-12 06:06:15 · answer #7 · answered by Alotta F 2 · 0 0

When you figure it out let me know . I want to get one , some day.

2006-10-12 17:08:03 · answer #8 · answered by litespeed2rw 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers