He pleads guilty and in the same breath says that this was "an honest mistake"? Puleeze!
2006-10-12 05:55:19 · 9 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hey-non compassionate lib--the question is not about Bush, but as long as you brought it up--please provide one tangible piece of evidence that Bush lied. (Something like DNA). Clinton lied under oath--proven by a stained dress. Why is there no TANGIBLE piece of evidence supporting your "Bush lies" assertion?
2006-10-12 06:37:02 · update #1
The Sandy Burger case is a clear example of how the left handles the truth. The liberals keep calling the right liars while they have their hand in the cookie jar. Many times the accuser is in fact the one guilty of what they are accusing the other of. There is an old quote that goes something like this, “Perhaps you protest too much…”
2006-10-12 06:12:00 · answer #1 · answered by damdawg 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wonder what was on the Clinton documents that they didnt want the 911 commission to see?You know Sandy Berger was doing the dirty work for Clinton.I am so glad that if finally is being investigated as a criminal offense,I hope they bury his sorry ***.
2006-10-12 06:04:49 · answer #2 · answered by halfbright 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Being that he's a Democratic Operative, maybe it was a mistake because he actually intended to stuff them in his associate's pants. That would have allowed him a little reach-around at the same time.
2006-10-12 06:58:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You do realize that the 'neocons' are currently doing the same thing in an Orwellian/Nazi rewriting of American history by removing/destroying and reclassifying material that goes back to the 1950s'. And don't try and say "Clinton did it too", because this is the first time in our 200 year history any administration has commenced doing so.
2006-10-12 06:04:47 · answer #4 · answered by Kelly L 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
It was and is a crime. But like most rich and/or well-connected ppl, Sandy 'Pants' Berger got a slap on the wrist and a 10,000 dollar fine - which he probably had in his other pocket.
2006-10-12 05:59:43 · answer #5 · answered by mikey 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
How is lying to the American public by Bush NOT an impeachable offense?
Puleeze!
2006-10-12 05:59:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Sandy is just a sloppy guy as we have been told by every single liberal, must make those papers down his pants pretty nasty.
2006-10-12 06:00:15 · answer #7 · answered by Colorado 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He mistakenly stuffed them down his pants... that is about a plausible an excuse as 'I did not mean to stab him the 20th time'
2006-10-12 05:57:27 · answer #8 · answered by DiamondDave 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It was not an honest anything. It is a crime. Sandy Burgler... ;-)
2006-10-12 05:57:03 · answer #9 · answered by Leah 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋