English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

U can grow ur own servant!

2006-10-12 04:39:10 · answer #1 · answered by Andy C 2 · 3 4

Its of a lot more value then spending thousands on a ratty little dog. And isn't it fun to read the names these kids are given? Of course later the celebs will be spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on shrinks for their adopted children, but I suppose they can afford it. And at least the kids won't starve to death. Overdose, maybe, but not starve.

2006-10-12 04:44:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It seems that way.

Great if they're doing it for the right reasons, but I doubt very much that they are.

Also, have you noticed that the father of the baby that Maddona has adopted has been in a lot of the papers. Wonder if he sold his story? Seems wrong to me.

2006-10-12 04:40:30 · answer #3 · answered by Wafflebox 5 · 2 0

i think it is becoming there fashion accessory, i not saying they shoundt be allowed i think it should be more secretive. the stars should stop being selfish and think how the kid will feel when its older and everybody in the world knows everything about them.

2006-10-12 05:07:22 · answer #4 · answered by mwashington_22 2 · 1 0

Glad to see you listen to Rush. I heard him ask that yesterday too. And I would hope that "the stars" take it more seriously than having a child be an accessory.

2006-10-12 04:39:14 · answer #5 · answered by Leah 6 · 1 1

Apparently there was a baby lineup of about 12 to choose from. Nice. Reminenscient of the slave trade days. Way to go Madonna.

2006-10-12 04:39:44 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 4 0

no longer all the girls who do undertake toddlers(of any colour) have a media schedule like Madonna and Angelina. I do think of that it attracts interest to them. I take concern with procuring a miles off places newborn. I incredibly do no longer think of that the toddler that Madonna has would be extra useful off along with her, her very own toddlers are not in a great place themselves. i think of that your remark a pair of puppy monkey fettish is impolite and uncalled for. In that gentle you have been mentioned! solid day.

2016-12-13 06:58:35 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes it is, and its a good deed too. Now the Africans are in a competition who is going to have the (Lucky Baby).

2006-10-12 04:46:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think it is because there wasn't so many of these cases 10 or 15 years ago. It is concentrated in the past few years.

2006-10-12 04:42:53 · answer #9 · answered by nat 1 · 1 0

I guess if the have to have one, it least is it one that might do some good for at least one child's life. So I'm not going to be too quick to condemn it. (Although I worry about the children given some of the star's lifestyles)

2006-10-12 04:40:01 · answer #10 · answered by dewcoons 7 · 2 1

This makes me so mad, there are plenty of kids in this country that need a home, oh yeah, hang on, how silly of me! White. pasty kids don't go with the Gucci handbag!! Doh!

2006-10-12 05:08:42 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers