If we were to take the lead, we'd be criticized for that too. Who thinks we should take the lead and have uni-lateral talks with N. Korea and why. (I think Bush is right)
2006-10-12 04:08:36 · 4 answers · asked by mei-lin 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
from what i have read it seems like us talking with north korea hasn't worked in the past so probably won't work now . if our allies show support and try to disarm north korea that will be a much bigger impact , japan has already jumped on that bandwagon and cut off some sources from north korea , of course if this doesn't work we will be at war like the liberals want right now , it is amazing how whatever america says they are doing the liberals go in the opposite direction no matter what
2006-10-12 04:14:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, I wonder how this would 'spin' if Bush were to CAVE to N Korea's threats of nuking the US if Bush doesn't have a face to face with Dim-Dung. Bush should not meet with that insane little tyrant at all. He can negotiate thru Japan, China and S Korea, but that psycho should get NO official recognition from the US. No one believes they have a nuclear war head. America would look even weaker in the eyes of our enemies if we coddled them. TAKE A STAND and tell Dim-Dung to "F" himself. If he tries anything--say good-bye to N.Korea and make a parking lot for the people of S. Korea.
2006-10-12 11:19:41 · answer #2 · answered by Cherie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes i agree with you!! I hear so much criticism of the U.S myself! When there are problems that needs sorting out in the world,I hear, "What is America going to do"! When she DOES do something,THAT is wrong as well!!! Hypocrites????????
2006-10-12 11:15:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do, too. The reason we are in this situation is that NK promised not to pursue nuclear weapons and did anyway.
2006-10-12 11:12:27 · answer #4 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋