In how many ways, has the Bush regime and it's cronie corporations, profited off the war in Iraq?

Answer 1

1. oil money
2. military money
3. wepaons manufacturing money
4. oil
5. money
6. making everyone forget about the Bin Ladens
7. Bush staying in power for a second term
8. being the only country in the world "allowed" to have nuclear weapons
9. using religion to gain supportors
10. oh and did I mention there is a lot of oil in iraq.

Answer 2

All corporations get a tax-break from buying stock of other corporations, to stimulate the economy, and help pay the taxes that help your house not get blown up. The largest at the top benefit the lesser making ones, and so it does follow downward, like a pyramid, which helps you not live in a cement hut, 6X6 feet, with only a dirt floor for furniture, before you go begging, or walking 2 miles for daily water, or selling your daughter, so your family may eat. Your questions are always broad, generalized statements that reflect a very poor grasp of the world, and its conditions and goings on in every way. But you DO ask alot of questions and TRY to sound informed, because you need attention and validation, which is why you want women to wonder what wearing xxl boxers implies from your handle, and the "love patch" thing. These are a very thinly veiled insecurities that women will see through. Just as your questions are very, very thinly veiled attempts to hide your VAST lack of knowledge in world events, please pick up a book. Yeah, it's easy to see right through you, in SO many ways. It's all right there.

Answer 3

Hi Mr imxxlboxe!!??? It's me!!!

Anyways, I was told you can be reached through this site through Jennifer, and she told me your parents are very hurt that you felt they would not understand. Your Dad was only ACTING mad at first because he thought you were joking!!!! Are you reading this? And as for you, Veronica V., you have made a few assumptions I could PROVE wrong, if I wanted to here, but it is none of your business.

Secondly, I heard you have been causing quite a commotion on the Yahoo answers board from Jennifer, OR, your house! Carlo says hello. Let me just say this, President Bush does not, and did not, make the decisions that have you so upset a couple of months back, alot of people did Mark!, and it is not only because of the tax-break thing, but also insurance companies lobby against yours and your friends "idea".

Thirdly, They sell things that you like in Canada, and you can do it there.

Fourthly,

Just because something is on paper doesn't mean it is more real than something that is not on paper. Plus, that "business idea" you and your friend had your hearts set on. Tell me then WHY you would stop talking to HIM?

5. Quit ranting and raving about Bush and the conspiracy of Republicans, or whoever else you are ranting about, and come to the people who care about you, and understand. ;)

Go Home! Everyone is waiting and noone is mad. Declaration of Independence, really? Oh yeah, I think you told me that once. GO HOME!

Answer 4

It is my understanding that Haliburton is "the" company that makes and sells military supplies - to the US military. Cheney and Bush both have large stocks in this company.

Answer 5

I dunno, why didn't we focus on Afghanistan when this whole 9/11 thing started? Isn't that where Osama was supposed to be? And if we going to take out "evil doers" and opressive leaders why didn't we invade North Korea along with Iraq?

Answer 6

in about as many ways as the Johnson white house profitted from Viet Nam...or the Roosevelt white house profitted from WWII Why can't yousee the history instead of the sound byte...anyone can go for the quick cheap shot...do your home work...nothing new here....

Answer 7

d like, moron.
I could salvo you with embarrassment every couple of days or so
Osama Bin Laden Invited to the White House?
Christopher Ruddy
Thursday, June 6, 2002 if you'
Osama Bin Laden Invited to the White House!
Now that sounds more than far-fetched. And certainly President Bush would rather see bin Laden's head on a platter than to have him as a dinner guest.

But a senior former CIA agent who served in the Middle East for almost two decades fighting terrorists thinks that bin Laden may believe that, like fellow terrorist leader Yasser Arafat, he may find himself someday a guest of a future U.S. president.

This former CIA officer, Robert Baer, recently wrote the explosive book "See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA's War on Terrorism."

Baer writes that when he sees Arafat "standing in the Rose Garden at the White House or when I hear that a CIA director has met privately with him at some desert tent, I wonder sometimes if Arafat's example doesn't make Osama bin Laden consider that he, too, might become a statesman in time."

Baer's point seems fantastic. However, we now know for a certainty that Arafat has masterminded and backed too many terrorist acts to count, from the Munich massacre to jet hijackings and worse.

A veteran of the Mideast, Baer knows Arafat. Baer writes that while "terrorist organizations operate like the most complicated interlocking directorate ever created," he discovered that many of the trails of these groups and their activities "converge at the feet of Yasser Arafat."

Yet today our liberal media prefer to describe Arafat as a freedom fighter. Baer's observations are deemed politically incorrect.

That may be one reason his book, with many important revelations, with a foreword by Seymour Hersh and published by Random House, has gotten such little media attention since it hit bookstores earlier this year.

Perhaps a companion book might have been titled: "Speak No Evil: Why A Veteran CIA Officer Should Keep His Mouth Shout About How Bill Clinton Undermined America's National Security."

While Baer fairly criticizes problems in the CIA and its handling of terrorism from the days of the Reagan and Bush administrations, he also clearly shows that the infrastructure of the CIA's ability to fight terrorism completely collapsed under Bill Clinton.

Here are just some of Baer's key points:

In 1991, the CIA closed up its activities in Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. During the Clinton years things got even worse, when CIA operatives around the globe were directed away from spying on the bad guys and told to start worrying about "human rights, economic globalization, the Arab-Israel conflict." By 1995, the Clinton administration thought spy operations were so unimportant that a CIA analyst who had never served as a spy or even overseas was made director of operations, the CIA's chief spy.

Iran remains a major player in the terrorist world. Baer says that in 1982, Arafat "had put his entire worldwide terrorist network at Iran's disposal." Baer believes that the Iranians were clearly the culprits behind the bombings of the U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks in the early 1980s. In 1996, bin Laden formed an alliance with Iran. The purpose of the alliance was simple: Attack America.

The Clinton White House's gross negligence and malfeasance was demonstrated by its handling of Saddam Hussein. Baer states that in 1995, top staffers at the National Security Council prevented a planned coup by Iraqi military leaders against Saddam Hussein. Baer was the top CIA man in Northern Iraq working with Iraqi dissidents.
Baer also reveals just how much the Clinton White House sought to protect Hussein.
In 1995 Baer was summoned by the CIA back from Iraq to Washington. Upon reporting to CIA headquarters, a CIA superior told him why he was called home: "Tony Lake [Bill Clinton's national security adviser] ordered the FBI to investigate you for trying to assassinate Saddam Hussein."

After months of investigation, the charges were found to be baseless and dropped.

Like many other CIA veterans who were thwarted from doing their jobs by their own government, Baer retired. Still, the CIA gave him due recognition. He was awarded its Career Intelligence Medal.

But the coddling of Hussein was not isolated to just targeting Baer and removing him from Iraq.

In fact, the Clinton White House clearly decided to keep and maintain Saddam Hussein in power. [Note: I suspected this back in 1998 and wrote about it in "Maybe Saddam Actually Likes Bill Clinton."]

In one of the most important revelations in "See No Evil," Baer reveals that Saddam Hussein might well have been deposed by his own troops, especially if the economic sanctions had been rigorously applied.

But with U.S. complicity, Saddam Hussein was able to sell millions of barrels of Iraqi oil by shipping them overland through NATO ally Turkey.

During the mid-'90s Baer says, the smuggled oil through Turkey "was a lifeline for Saddam, who used the money to fund his intelligence services and Special Republican Guards – the forces that kept him alive."

The pipeline of smuggled oil was no hidden, disputed fact. Baer reports the Iraqi oil trucks stretched back anywhere from 20 miles to 70 miles as they waited to cross into Turkey.

Baer was baffled. He writes, "What I couldn't understand was why the White House didn't intervene." He says the U.S. could easily have closed down the truck pipeline into Turkey.

"It was almost as if the White House wanted Saddam to have a little walking around money," Baer writes.

Baer concludes that the Clinton administration "helped Saddam pay for his praetorian guard, just what you'd expect of a clever superpower that was secretly supporting the local despot."

Why would Bill Clinton, our president, do such a thing? Why would he help Saddam Hussein at the very time his public rhetoric against him was so strong?

Nobody who has studied Bill Clinton should be surprised by his duplicity. The facts show, and future historians will discover, that Bill Clinton was no friend of the United States.

Editor's Note: Get your copy of "See No Evil" at a great price – CLICK HERE NOW.