English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

He is out PRESIDENT so everything wrong with the nation should be put on his shoulders as well as everything good going on. Comes with the job my friend.
And by the way he is a failure!

2006-10-12 03:34:45 · answer #1 · answered by mistatnn 2 · 2 0

Hi Mr imxxlboxe!!??? It's me!!!

Anyways, I was told you can be reached through this site through Jennifer, and she told me your parents are very hurt that you felt they would not understand. Your Dad was only ACTING mad at first because he thought you were joking!!!! Are you reading this? And as for you, Veronica V., you have made a few assumptions I could PROVE wrong, if I wanted to here, but it is none of your business.

Secondly, I heard you have been causing quite a commotion on the Yahoo answers board from Jennifer, OR, your house! Carlo says hello. Let me just say this, President Bush does not, and did not, make the decisions that have you so upset a couple of months back, alot of people did Mark!, and it is not only because of the tax-break thing, but also insurance companies lobby against yours and your friends "idea".

Thirdly, They sell things that you like in Canada, and you can do it there.

Fourthly,

Just because something is on paper doesn't mean it is more real than something that is not on paper. Plus, that "business idea" you and your friend had your hearts set on. Tell me then WHY you would stop talking to HIM?

5. Quit ranting and raving about Bush and the conspiracy of Republicans, or whoever else you are ranting about, and come to the people who care about you, and understand. ;)

Go Home! Everyone is waiting and noone is mad. Declaration of Independence, really? Oh yeah, I think you told me that once. GO HOME!

2006-10-12 09:13:16 · answer #2 · answered by Mojo Jojo 2 · 0 0

There was a campaign to create that connection via Google-bomb a few years ago. Apparently it's still working. Want to know what a Google bomb can accomplish? Try Googling "Santorum" (the right-wing Pennsylvania senator) and see what you get.

2006-10-12 03:42:48 · answer #3 · answered by x 7 · 1 0

Because people blow things out of proportion.

I agree he's not the sharpest tool in the shed.. but GWB is being blamed for every mishap in the country. The failures of our country need to be blamed on the entire government.

2006-10-12 03:29:33 · answer #4 · answered by bill m 3 · 3 0

"bullsh*t" i'm incredibly severe. enable me quote the definition from the yank history college dictionary, 4th version: As a noun: "a million. silly, deceitful, arrogant, or insolent language. 2. something valueless, deceptive, or insincere." As a verb: "a million. to talk foolishly or insolently. 2. to objective to lie to via talking nonsense." i think of this gets to the midsection of our issues, exceptionally in Iraq, yet in addition interior the justice branch and different concerns.

2016-12-13 06:54:59 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because he's the BIGGEST failure this country has seen and since the united states owns the internet including everything else in teh world (or so we think!), that's just how it is......

2006-10-12 03:33:07 · answer #6 · answered by precious02k 3 · 3 0

That's easy to get done. Is it as easy admitting you are 12 years old, play ex-box all day, and jump up to type things on the computer as soon as you hear it from thebitter because they were just fired from Jack-In-TheBox, non-deodorant wearing adults around you, in your footie pajamas, no doubt?

2006-10-12 04:54:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No bush fan, but its probably because there are thousands of blogs out there and opinion pieces where he is deemed as such.

2006-10-12 03:58:05 · answer #8 · answered by Lotus Phoenix 6 · 1 0

LOL it still does that? That has been a joke going around for a few years now.

2006-10-12 03:27:26 · answer #9 · answered by Isis 3 · 1 1

LEARN



Osama Bin Laden Invited to the White House?
Christopher Ruddy
Thursday, June 6, 2002
Osama Bin Laden Invited to the White House!
Now that sounds more than far-fetched. And certainly President Bush would rather see bin Laden's head on a platter than to have him as a dinner guest.

But a senior former CIA agent who served in the Middle East for almost two decades fighting terrorists thinks that bin Laden may believe that, like fellow terrorist leader Yasser Arafat, he may find himself someday a guest of a future U.S. president.

This former CIA officer, Robert Baer, recently wrote the explosive book "See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA's War on Terrorism."

Baer writes that when he sees Arafat "standing in the Rose Garden at the White House or when I hear that a CIA director has met privately with him at some desert tent, I wonder sometimes if Arafat's example doesn't make Osama bin Laden consider that he, too, might become a statesman in time."

Baer's point seems fantastic. However, we now know for a certainty that Arafat has masterminded and backed too many terrorist acts to count, from the Munich massacre to jet hijackings and worse.

A veteran of the Mideast, Baer knows Arafat. Baer writes that while "terrorist organizations operate like the most complicated interlocking directorate ever created," he discovered that many of the trails of these groups and their activities "converge at the feet of Yasser Arafat."

Yet today our liberal media prefer to describe Arafat as a freedom fighter. Baer's observations are deemed politically incorrect.

That may be one reason his book, with many important revelations, with a foreword by Seymour Hersh and published by Random House, has gotten such little media attention since it hit bookstores earlier this year.

Perhaps a companion book might have been titled: "Speak No Evil: Why A Veteran CIA Officer Should Keep His Mouth Shout About How Bill Clinton Undermined America's National Security."

While Baer fairly criticizes problems in the CIA and its handling of terrorism from the days of the Reagan and Bush administrations, he also clearly shows that the infrastructure of the CIA's ability to fight terrorism completely collapsed under Bill Clinton.

Here are just some of Baer's key points:

In 1991, the CIA closed up its activities in Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. During the Clinton years things got even worse, when CIA operatives around the globe were directed away from spying on the bad guys and told to start worrying about "human rights, economic globalization, the Arab-Israel conflict." By 1995, the Clinton administration thought spy operations were so unimportant that a CIA analyst who had never served as a spy or even overseas was made director of operations, the CIA's chief spy.

Iran remains a major player in the terrorist world. Baer says that in 1982, Arafat "had put his entire worldwide terrorist network at Iran's disposal." Baer believes that the Iranians were clearly the culprits behind the bombings of the U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks in the early 1980s. In 1996, bin Laden formed an alliance with Iran. The purpose of the alliance was simple: Attack America.

The Clinton White House's gross negligence and malfeasance was demonstrated by its handling of Saddam Hussein. Baer states that in 1995, top staffers at the National Security Council prevented a planned coup by Iraqi military leaders against Saddam Hussein. Baer was the top CIA man in Northern Iraq working with Iraqi dissidents.
Baer also reveals just how much the Clinton White House sought to protect Hussein.
In 1995 Baer was summoned by the CIA back from Iraq to Washington. Upon reporting to CIA headquarters, a CIA superior told him why he was called home: "Tony Lake [Bill Clinton's national security adviser] ordered the FBI to investigate you for trying to assassinate Saddam Hussein."

After months of investigation, the charges were found to be baseless and dropped.

Like many other CIA veterans who were thwarted from doing their jobs by their own government, Baer retired. Still, the CIA gave him due recognition. He was awarded its Career Intelligence Medal.

But the coddling of Hussein was not isolated to just targeting Baer and removing him from Iraq.

In fact, the Clinton White House clearly decided to keep and maintain Saddam Hussein in power. [Note: I suspected this back in 1998 and wrote about it in "Maybe Saddam Actually Likes Bill Clinton."]

In one of the most important revelations in "See No Evil," Baer reveals that Saddam Hussein might well have been deposed by his own troops, especially if the economic sanctions had been rigorously applied.

But with U.S. complicity, Saddam Hussein was able to sell millions of barrels of Iraqi oil by shipping them overland through NATO ally Turkey.

During the mid-'90s Baer says, the smuggled oil through Turkey "was a lifeline for Saddam, who used the money to fund his intelligence services and Special Republican Guards – the forces that kept him alive."

The pipeline of smuggled oil was no hidden, disputed fact. Baer reports the Iraqi oil trucks stretched back anywhere from 20 miles to 70 miles as they waited to cross into Turkey.

Baer was baffled. He writes, "What I couldn't understand was why the White House didn't intervene." He says the U.S. could easily have closed down the truck pipeline into Turkey.

"It was almost as if the White House wanted Saddam to have a little walking around money," Baer writes.

Baer concludes that the Clinton administration "helped Saddam pay for his praetorian guard, just what you'd expect of a clever superpower that was secretly supporting the local despot."

Why would Bill Clinton, our president, do such a thing? Why would he help Saddam Hussein at the very time his public rhetoric against him was so strong?

Nobody who has studied Bill Clinton should be surprised by his duplicity. The facts show, and future historians will discover, that Bill Clinton was no friend of the United States.

Editor's Note: Get your copy of "See No Evil" at a great price – CLICK HERE NOW.

2006-10-12 11:44:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers