Wouldn't you all agree that the major threat to US national security is N. Korea and/or Iran giving a nuclear bomb to Al Qaeda who then uses it against the US? We got Saddam, there ain't any WMDs in Iraq I say we start kicking some Iranian and N. Korean butt with the full force of our military and fight a real war and not this insurgent crap.
2006-10-12 02:54:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
And then you'd complain about that ,
1. we have ground , air and naval forces on 3 sides of Iran , coincidence (?)
2. China isn't backing N.Korea as they did in the past and is putting diplomatic preasure on them . So is Japan , S. Korea , Australia and others .
3. we have enough military forces in place to blow N. Korea to the moon , if need be .
Ever play chess ?
Half the game is positional strategy .
We have the positional advantage .
By the way , Male cheerleaders spend much more time with the girl cheerleaders than football players .
Again POSITIONAL ADVANTAGE !
2006-10-12 03:12:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
an extremely stable, question. one that I definitely have been soliciting for some years now! although the respond I definitely have arise nonetheless fail to cajole genuinely every physique and people who're not confident have consistently did not arise with solutions that have been convincing to me! in case you may get i actually convince answer that's a hundred% agreeable by using all, i'm going to be extremely satisfied. extra I definitely have in basic terms check out the diverse solutions, it extremely is a tragic unhappy international, the memories some people tell to cajole themselves and others. It genuinely wasn't an extremely strategic pass! think of approximately it, the U. S. became already committed on one front, in basic terms a fool or a mad guy could do such an pointless element! till there became yet another objective? yet i'm sorry my buddy the Pan Narrans won't purchase it! 'the_mystagogue_twicebo...' makes a solid factor although he looks to have ignored a pair of significant issues, that are the so call grasp pass has resulted in a much extra volatile international and positioned the rustic out in the chilly. by way of fact the invasion the be conscious American has very practically replace right into a vulgarity in many circles, effortless by way of fact such an action is moraly incorrect! and of direction it extremely is an engaging tale, whether it extremely is by using no potential the finished tale!
2016-10-16 02:48:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you. I mean we have caught Saddam, what else is bush looking for over there? I mean he isnt going to find that other guy so he might as well just go and start attacking N.Korea/ and Iran because they are the real threat.
2006-10-12 02:56:39 · answer #3 · answered by Katherine S 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
When Oliver North has complete controll of the NY Times
2006-10-12 02:56:52 · answer #4 · answered by Scott B 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why should we be attacking anyone
i dislike bush in every way shape and form
but why are u ragging on him for being a cheerleader
I would in no way shape or form think if cheerleaders when i think of bush
2006-10-12 02:56:02 · answer #5 · answered by Coxie Megan 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
because Nancy Pillow and the dems would never let him sleep.
2006-10-12 02:55:46 · answer #6 · answered by thepoet01 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
not a good idea, buddy.
consider they would fight back using nuclear weapons possibly.
2006-10-12 02:55:16 · answer #7 · answered by Martin the baby 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
okie dokie
2006-10-12 02:56:30 · answer #8 · answered by bradthepilot 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋