English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is true if a man grows barely underarm or no underarm hair has no chest or stomach hair and claimed there indian does it prove it?

2006-10-12 02:07:07 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Anthropology

4 answers

i dont understand the question

2006-10-12 02:13:03 · answer #1 · answered by dancingwiththestars 4 · 0 0

Some Indians do have chest and stomach hair. But there's nothing wrong with NOT having chest and stomach hair.

2006-10-12 09:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by R.C.P. 3 · 0 0

No, it doesn't prove it. There are many reasons for not having much or any body hair. Hey, maybe you're among the first to make the next evolutionary jump - hairless humankind.

2006-10-12 22:25:55 · answer #3 · answered by phaig93 4 · 0 0

I have reservations.

2006-10-12 09:08:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers