...of Bush's TAX CUTS?!?!?
And during a time of expensive war?
Naw, it must just be a holdover from something Clinton did 9 years ago.
No links provided, research for yourselves you doubting liberals. Feel the pain of being wrong AGAIN!
2006-10-12 01:28:30 · 5 answers · asked by El Pistolero Negra 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
kingstubborn-
I agree we have those issues with the Republican party, but doesn't the saying go, "it's the economy, stupid"?
We'll rid the party of these liberal issues in good time.
2006-10-12 01:39:46 · update #1
Despite all the screaming by the Democrats and the News Media, Bush's tax cuts have brought about a drop in the deficit.
Tax Cuts Always Decrease the Deficit..
Proven by Bush.
Proven by Reagan.
Proven by JFK.
2006-10-12 02:04:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wars generally do increase economic activity in a country, but I'll bet the economy would do even better if we actually had manufacturing in this country instead of instead China.
It is great to see a lower deficit...but we still depend have deficit spending and Bush is responsible for massive government growth (i.e., Homeland Security (a joke), Medicare expansion (A bribe to senior voters, No Child Left Behind (co-sponsored with Ted Kennedy))...gee are you sure Bush isn't a liberal?
2006-10-12 08:33:33 · answer #2 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the US budget deficit is on an all time high, very much because of the expensive war, your information is incorrect.
I'm not a citizen of the USA and not a partisan of any US party.
I would just like the US to prosper, because that would be good for the economy in the whole world.
I hope, and with me many economists, that there will be a soft landing of your economy, rather than a depression.
2006-10-12 08:46:18 · answer #3 · answered by Dick V 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you obviously are an economic idiot
When Bush took office there was a surplus that was paying off the national debt!
Now not only are we running a deficit and not even paying the interest on that debt- which is not figured into your tabulations!
so what we have is last year there was a 300 billion dollar deficit + the interest on the debt and you are bragging about cutting the deficit- only spending 240 million more than came in this year
THE DROP WOULD NOT COVER THE INTREST!!!
2006-10-12 09:27:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better watch out, I posted this under an old name and got banned, totally banned. Liberals hate the truth.
2006-10-12 08:30:41 · answer #5 · answered by Meow the cat 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋