Pres. Bush said that now is the time for diplomacy, but then he said that he refuses to talk with North Korea.
Is anyone else confused??
2006-10-12 01:24:32 · 9 answers · asked by cosmiccastaway 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Confused?! I think Bush is sending mixed messages to North Korea! It looks like diplomacy is not on the table as of yet in this confused mind of our incompetent president!
2006-10-12 01:49:07 · answer #1 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
confused? no.
Bush refuses unilateral talks with NK, because NK insists that it is the only legal government of ALL of Korea.
Unilateral talks would mean having to dump SK to the mercy of NK.
It was done in South Vietnam. Ended with 4 milion murdered south vietnamese. My guess Bush does not want a repeated performance.
2006-10-12 08:33:41 · answer #2 · answered by cp_scipiom 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He absolutley agrees to speak to North Korea. In multi-lateral talks. one on one is fruitless. It is a simple ploy the North Koreans have used for years. Stop closing your eyes or take some IQ pills or something.
2006-10-12 08:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
North Korea should be blockaded because diplomacy was not effective.
2006-10-12 08:26:46 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Confusing, isn't it?
That he did not want a dialog with anyone, only imposing his authority.
Now, he got the nation in such a mess, and fear for North Korea's power. SUCK IT UP, GEORGE!
2006-10-12 08:42:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, sorta like asking a girl on a date but refusing to be around her.
2006-10-12 08:28:49 · answer #6 · answered by Enterrador 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is also a part of diplomacy.
2006-10-12 08:26:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2006-10-12 08:26:09 · answer #8 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You mean like Neville Chamberlain ?
2006-10-12 08:25:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋