We aren't, danger is everywhere, but some sheep seem to believe that we are and are willing to throw away rights and liberties to feel safer, who's the "coward" now?
2006-10-12 01:21:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Enterrador 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Its not a matter of Repubs Vs Dem. It was an accident. We will never be safe. If someone really wants to blow something up they will figure out a way to do it. There is no way we can stop everything from happening. But for arguments sake, I believe the democrats had to vote on and pass some of the things that you are blaming the republicans for. I don't belong to a party for that reason. Both are full of it. People need to open their minds up to more than one view of how things should run. No president or house or Senate will make everyone happy. You or I would more than likely be hated by a large percentage of the population if we were on TV and our every move was examined and broken down. So back to the question. We are not safer, but it's not Bush's fault. Pull your head out and look around once in a while. You might learn something for yourself if you pay attention.
2006-10-12 01:42:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by backdoc 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was an accident with a small plane. It is not Bush's fault. Bush is not to blame for every accident that has happened or will happen since 9/11.
2006-10-12 02:41:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by nite_raideress 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The plane accident was a Bush failure, huh? I see, I guess he too can be blamed for something like that. Anyway, Enterrado claims we are no safer now....so the few plots that have been discovered due to our policies are just what? Because I guess you can't call them Bush SUCCESSES, can you? Try it though.
2006-10-12 01:42:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are not safe anywhere. The way you are asking is not correct. What happened now was an unintentional accident. Accident can happen anywhere. when you are walking, when you are at home & so on. But Sep 11 was intentional. sep 11 was done to harm people. Bush shouldn't be blamed for all the accidents that happen every were. so please think before asking.
2006-10-12 01:26:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Planes are authorized to fly over New York but the probability of an accident still occurs just like what happened to the plane of Lidle.
2006-10-12 01:19:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Everything is Bushes fault.He is the only world leader truly fighting for freedom. If anyone seriously wants to learn about what is at stake in America please watch this video. It is a little long but it is very insightful to how damaging people can be that don't care about their own country.
2006-10-12 01:25:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by RIDLEY 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Duh....Bush wasn't flying the plane. You aren't safe if you go in high rise buildings.
Me....I don't go where I'm not safe.
2006-10-12 01:25:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this what passes for thought amongst the Bush-hating herd?
2006-10-12 01:33:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
King George I and his CIA buddies planned 9/11. They had nothing to do with this.
2006-10-12 01:26:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋