look no matter which party you are affiliated w/ it makes no sense to pic on a lackt like sadaam
we all knew it was kinda wishy washy to go into Iraq ( I was pizzed to on 9/11) we also knew afhganistan Wasd harboring the talaban so so dod we fall forvthe slam dunk of did bush the the job of a saint
2006-10-12 00:50:58 · 14 answers · asked by windyctlvr 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
god bless all of you guys ok
2006-10-12 00:51:38 · update #1
i think oil has a lot to do with it..
2006-10-12 01:04:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Kim Jong Il is a nusiance not a threat. He's nothing but a big baby kicking and screaming because he's getting no attention. However, he does have alot of money because he starves his people to death. For some unknown reason he thinks we & S. Korea are going to invade his country. Oil or no oil, there is nothing there anybody wants. He won't bomb us because he doesn't have the delivery system. He can however bomb S. Korea and that will draw us into the fight by treaty. He can also sell his nukes to the towel headed cave dwellers that have the delivery system. He has not yet tried to, or has funded anyone who can infiltrate U.S. Borders. Saddam has. No question, Saddam had to go for a whole host of reasons, but mainly it was the pecking order. The middle east wants us gone - period!! And those three countries were the ones capable of doing it. Saddam was the easiest target. Remember, this is a war on Terror (Saddam, Kim Jong Il, Ahmadinejad, and bin Laden), not Iran, Iraq, and N. Korea. We need to clean house or you'll be wearing a Burqua.
2006-10-12 08:05:38 · answer #2 · answered by Jim C 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nuclear proliferation cannot be stemmed as long as it is universally adopted by all nations. All the nuclear powers must voluntarily come forward to dismantle the nuclear armaments and then implement penal measures against those tinkering with nuke tests.
All that wisdom that you spew about Taliban and all is OK in hindsight. Bush is dealing with the problem, as it is now. There is no point in saying now that you should have done this or that. Bush is doing the correct thing, as the leader of the States.
2006-10-12 08:00:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK guys we don't want Iraq's Oil. Can you understand that?
We want a base in the Mideast to prevent Islamo-fascist
governments from controlling the area and using oil as a weapon. Gee what country supports terrorists (Militants)
wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth and is a sworn enemy of the evil free world? It ain't North Korea.
The concern with NK is selling plutonium to Islamic Terrorist (Militants) . Were back at the Mideast again.
Now if Ha-mas uses a little plutonium with their next bomb attack in Israel. How do you think Israel will respond?
They would probably nuke the countries helping Ha-mas.
Couldn't this escalate into World War?
Shouldn't some country be watching out for the rest of worlds interest in this Islamic crusade, seeing how it could escalate?.
2006-10-12 08:23:03 · answer #4 · answered by Red 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We probably were waiting for China to get involved in the situation in a way we saw as positive.
Kim Jong IL is crazy, and we don't even know for sure that it was really a true nuclear test yet.
I'm not defending our sophomoric foreign policy attempts. I was against the invasion of Iraq before it even happened.
2006-10-12 08:01:00 · answer #5 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The person you should ask that question in Mr. George W. Bush. I suggest we all write/e-mail/telephone camp out side the whitehouse in a mob until we get a straight answer.
End the war in Iraq by Christmas.
2006-10-12 07:56:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Iraq has oil and pissed off the first Bush, so junior being an idioit wanted to fonish what his pappy started. Bush was also scred to death that China would again back N. Korea, and like the coward he is , he only picks a fight, that he thinks he can win
2006-10-12 07:54:32 · answer #7 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I suggest taking a look in the archives at the other 255 questions that covered this topic, along with what answers you get in here. Of course answer man has said oil everytime he answered, but we all know he wants nuclear power like Ahmadinejad.
2006-10-12 07:55:57 · answer #8 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We knew about Iraq in the 90s.
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
2006-10-12 08:22:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraq is a stragedically placed country, it would benefit us to have another friend in the middle east. N.Korea would have us bump heads with another super power, china...
2006-10-12 08:04:00 · answer #10 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
that's the way the u.s system works..mess with small country's that have a small air force or military. an its all about oil oil oil..the u.s can't push n.korea around .like they can with some other country's..why don't they chance the system in china?
2006-10-12 07:59:05 · answer #11 · answered by hotguy24ca 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋