Should I pull the trigger on this trade.?

Question

I was offered Joey Galloway and Nate Kaeding for my Warrick Dunn and Drew Bennet. I have LJ, Frank Gore, M. Turner, M. Jones-Drew, and Leon Washington for RB. My WR are A. Boldin, A. Gates (TE not required), M. Colston, Braylon Edwards, and Matt Jones. I know I need another WR , but I don't know if I can afford to give up Dunn. My kicker is John Carney, I wanted Kaeding so I wouldn't have to deal with bye issues, plus he's a darn good kicker.

Ok I just got offered this trade too. Edge James and Ashley Lelie for Dunn and F. Gore. Any thoughts on that one???

Answer 1

I wouldn't make either of these trades. Galloway has a QB that's making his 2nd start if his career and kickers are easy to come by. As for the trade for Gore and Dunn, Edge isn't that good in AZ, he's missing Fitzgerald (who takes some pressure off the run game) for a month , plus they are playing the Bears this week and they have their bye week coming up. Dunn has already had his bye week and they have a much better running game. I don't even need to comment on Gore because the trade is already so slanted towards the person offering the trade, you would be crazy to accept it. Hope this helps

Answer 2

I think you have the ammo to do a better trade and you have a need for a receiver but you don't need another kicker.

You have a slew of good running backs. How many do you start? Frank Gore and Larry Johnson are weekly starts. If you need a third starter, Maurice Jones-Drew is solid and they are revving up Leon Washington since Kevin Barlow is averaging a meager 2.8 a carry or something. I think you could use Galloway also given that your wide receivers are not all that good. Antonio Gates hasn't been targeted by Philip Rivers until this past week. Matt Jones and Drew Bennett haven't done anything this year.

But seriously though, you can pick up a kicker to fill in your bye week very easily so what's the obsession with Nate Kaeding about? I bet John Carney has scored more points than Kaeding this year and he's not a shabby kicker himself.

I'd try and milk a little more for Warrick Dunn and forget about acquiring Kaeding and try and get a better WR or something.

Answer 3

Ok definitely don't even consider the second one. You are giving away two starting RB's for a RB that isn't getting to run in ARZ and Lelie who isn't a big producer.

As for the first trade. I think you stay with what you got but maybe drop Bennet. As good a backups as you have in Drew, Turner and Washington, giving up Warrick Dunn on a Running team is juts not a good move. Galloway on your team would fit in as a 3rd receiver probably behind Gates and Boldin but Marques colston and Braylon Edwards are not bad options as 3rd receivers. Matt Jones I would consider dropping and looking at the waiver wire as well. Bennett is possibly out this week and Jones is on a bye and has been hampered by injury all year long.

in all don't make the trade. Not worth giving up a starting and top 10 RB probably for a top 20 WR and a kicker.

Answer 4

Naw never give up a Good Rb for a good WR. Kadeing is whatever for Bennett???
Keep your players and if you really want to trade you can do Dunn for Galloway if you are desperate. But you should keep with your guys. Kickers dont matter

Answer 5

well,kickers are a dime a dozen so i think ur right, giving up Warrick Dunn might be to much 4 u to give up. i think it depends on ur position,do u have a go enough record to give him up and can u survive with out him later.Joey Galloway should pick up more yards and tds,i suggest that u try to get a Rb out of the trade ,if not hold strong and look hard in free agent pool,since Larry f.is out for 2 to 5 week pick up Bryant Johnson,he might do somethin

Answer 6

i does no longer do it as a results of fact Brandon Jacobs could have a miles better twelve months than Portis. Chicago's protection gets worn down this twelve months from carrying the offense on its back. Ward and residences is a toss up as to who gets extra TD's. you have a competent team, do no longer take a gamble. shop it love it somewhat is.