Who is the better frontman?
2006-10-11 20:46:24 · 17 answers · asked by Arts 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
I have to go with Freddie Mercury. Mick Jagger has a great stage presence, but he can't sing worth a darn. I think it's the whole 60's thing. I've listened to many 60's songs and it seems that many of the lead singers just can't sing.
2006-10-11 20:57:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well seeings how Freddie Mercury is dead now. I'm going with Mick Jagger. I think Mick Jagger is the better front man anyway. I never could stand Freddie Mercury.
2006-10-11 20:57:47 · answer #2 · answered by Marenight 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another One Bites the Dust
mourn for Freddie, .........Brian May
ROCKS
so does Bill Wyman, Charlie Watts, Ron Wood, Mick Jagger and the Stones
2006-10-11 21:00:47 · answer #3 · answered by goodcharacter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freddie
2006-10-11 23:51:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jagger
2006-10-14 15:40:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mick Jagger, of course - at least when he was at his peak in the 60s and early 70s. Freddie would have been great at karoake if he was still around. IMHO Queen are one of the worst bands I have ever heard. They ARE NOT rock'n'roll, more like very bad cabaret.
2006-10-11 21:00:39 · answer #6 · answered by radiocitizen 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Definitely Mick Jagger....Freddie's dead already.
2006-10-11 20:57:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
freddie coz hes an amazing singer much better than mick
2006-10-11 21:02:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freddie Definately, there is no comparison really, he was in a class of his own.
Queen were never classed as Rock n roll. They were a sound of their own which didnt really have a category, the closes they came to was stadium rock.
2006-10-11 22:16:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well freddie cant be, cause he is dead.
anyway i say Mick Jagger.
2006-10-11 20:48:31 · answer #10 · answered by Martin the baby 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋