2006-10-11 18:12:56 · 12 answers · asked by Dave 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think both parties have had a very hard time finding decent candidates that "deserve" it over the past two presidential elections...
short of Hillary and Frist (watch these two get it now)... I can't imagine this one being as bad...
2006-10-11 18:26:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To sononbir etc... Bush is the main reason N Korea has nukes? You've got to be joking. Try Bill Clinton and the psycho, paranoid dictator, Kim Jung Ill. This is another issue that Clinton should have dealt with but didn't because he was too busy with...that woman, Ms Lewinsky. He only threw money at them and took the psycho's word that he wouldn't develop nukes.
2006-10-12 01:30:18 · answer #2 · answered by Cinner 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love everyone that crits bush i can't wait til he gets out and we get someone i n that wont stand up for our country and we get terror attacked up the *** and schools are being bombed then u stupid asses wont be saying... ANYONES BETTER THEN BUSH will u? i hope we get a democrat.. they are all about peace and letting the united states being **** on see how much u like watching ur kids being blown up because theyve already threatened it after bush gets out
anyway
i think president is a serious job that needs done by someone who cares about our country and the people in it and not about all the other countries people and omg we are bombing them who gives a **** our country first right? haha
its a job just like other ones so i don't think deserve is a word for it
2006-10-12 01:22:57 · answer #3 · answered by Hayden 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dave, I am an Idealist in most ways. I believe you get largely what you give and how you treat people. I have rarely been "burned" which I credit to either my lack of experience, my ignorance, or how I treat others. I, however, do not believe that someone who has a 'do unto others as " philosophy would make it in this" dog eat dog world". Am I wrong?
2006-10-12 01:22:50 · answer #4 · answered by To Be 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In about a year it's all you will be hearing about!
Actually, he has 2 years and 3 months left.
2006-10-12 01:15:56 · answer #5 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush is the main reason of making north korea have nuclear boombs
because after his attack on iraq he made all the world never trust america any more and run faster than the time to have nuclear weapons to avoide the fate of iraq
2006-10-12 01:17:32 · answer #6 · answered by micho 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it is time for a woman president
2006-10-12 01:20:50 · answer #7 · answered by M N 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone is better than Bush. A braindead chimpanzee can do a better job.
2006-10-12 01:14:53 · answer #8 · answered by Chris W 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush hasen't DESERVED to be president for SIX YEARS, so ANYBODY would be better!
2006-10-12 01:16:53 · answer #9 · answered by backinbowl 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course there is, we'll just never get them. Lucky if we ever even hear of them. Its like saying, "are there any girls who sing better than Britney Spears?"
2006-10-12 01:25:33 · answer #10 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋