English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and why?

2006-10-11 18:09:19 · 26 answers · asked by tenaciousd 6 in Politics & Government Elections

Chris you realize they're Canadian, right? Canada is a very funny state, none of its citizens can run for president.

2006-10-12 06:38:22 · update #1

Stop insurgency - interesting paste but just a paste and not an answer to my question.

2006-10-12 23:39:33 · update #2

26 answers

Hilary Clinton has done a good job as Senator. She would have a great adviser, Bill, who might like consenting adult women. but does not prey upon young boys. Yes he lied about having sex with her, but who hasn't lied about sex at one time or another, did he cover up any felony crimes? No, just a personal matter, in which the very people who are guilty of this Foley cover up tried their best to ruin the Presidency by spending millions of dollars (mine and yours by the way) to catch Bill lying about his personal sex life. There is a big difference here. I would vote for Hillary because look at the Republicans and where they have us now. This country needs to be run by the constitution, not the religious right, who wants to push their morals on everyone else. Get real people! Wake up!!

2006-10-11 18:27:40 · answer #1 · answered by DAVID T 3 · 3 0

I will vote for the Libertarian candidate as I have in the last two elections.

I do think if the Democrats are smart enough to nominate Hillary Clinton, the only person who can beat her is Condi Rice. I don't have space to discuss the whole political analysis here--there are some old articles on my blog if your are interested.

2006-10-12 03:01:45 · answer #2 · answered by beckychr007 6 · 2 0

Absolutly no question, Hillary Clinton. Although, I think there are probably better Democratic candidates out there, Clinton has the exposure and the momentum. The number one reason I would never vote for Condi Rice is that she can't be trusted. She has flatly lied time and again to defend President Bush. She said President Clinton didn't leave a comprehensive plan for fighting Al Qaeda, which was a complete lie. She has said that she didn't recall extreamly important conversations that took place. And all this just recently. She, like President Bush and the rest of his Administration, will say anything at any time to make themselves look better. It doesn't matter to them whether they are lying or not. So I would never vote for Rice or anyone else connected with the Bush Adminstration.

2006-10-12 01:19:41 · answer #3 · answered by Alex 3 · 3 3

Definitely Rice out of these two. For those of you who think Clinton is on the right side of the issues, I hope you do some further research. She wants to raise taxes on the very people who provide jobs just like Kerry wanted to do. He said he wouldn't hurt small business owners because he was targeting personal income. I'm a professional tax preparer and I can assure you that small business owners who do not incorporate or enter into a partnership must claim their income on their personal 1040 via a Schedule C. Vote for lower taxes and more personal freedom with our money. That is where the true power lies for the little person in America.

2006-10-12 02:57:30 · answer #4 · answered by iuneedscoachknight 4 · 0 2

If I bother to vote (doubtful), it'll be for whoever is on the Libertarian ticket most likely.

Between Rice and Clinton (or any other Republicrats), it matters very little. They simply argue about the rate at which government should expand, and which special interests should benefit from my labor. I invite both parties to have relations with themselves.

2006-10-12 01:20:04 · answer #5 · answered by lenny 7 · 1 1

Robin Williams

2006-10-12 01:46:00 · answer #6 · answered by bonobo 2 · 2 0

H.Clinton of course for many reasons
1)when her husband cheated she didn't kill him so she won't let her emotions get in the way and she has done a lot for women in general
2)if she had be in control or even had the role of C.Rice during Katrina it would have been handled much better in my opion
3)the war would come to an end
4)the world would be a better place
5)C.Rice sucks and doesn't know what the heck she is doing and just makes herself look like a freakin idiot

2006-10-12 01:19:02 · answer #7 · answered by p-nut butter princess 4 · 4 2

Al Gore

2006-10-12 02:52:58 · answer #8 · answered by jennilaine777 4 · 0 1

I would vote for Condi Rice, since she is so much smarter than Hilary Clinton. Condi Rice has a much more impressive profile than H. Clinton, especially since Rice was a provost at Stanford University before George W Bush tapped her to join his cabinet.

2006-10-12 01:19:40 · answer #9 · answered by wsamson_7121 2 · 3 3

Dr. Rice of course. I have had enough of Bill in the White House.

2006-10-12 02:15:35 · answer #10 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers