I don't believe freedom of expression was ever intended to allow protesters to interrupt funerals for war heroes. I think it's tragically ironic that these men and women die so that people here can continue to have that right. I also think it's appalling that people would do such a thing just because they can.
2006-10-11 17:06:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by dbackbarb 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is always the standard...you can't yell fire in a crowded theater if there is no fire.
And any time classified government material is being provided to our enemies.
Other than those 2 primary examples I support Freedom of expression as long as it doesn't falsely liable, defame or cause a person to be injured by false accusations made under the guise of the 1st Amendment.
2006-10-12 00:06:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by iraq51 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, for instance at my college graduation we had President George W. Bush come and speak. It was an absolute honor to have the president their speaking to us. Well of course there were people ruining it by protesting outside the stadium. You could hear them during his speech, it was very rude. People even skipped graduation to protest. have no problem if you want to protest, but DO NOT DO IT on such a special occasion such as graduation. It really ruined it for alot of people. Besides he never even went near where they were so its like he can see their signs or anything. It was incredibly stupid.
2006-10-12 00:05:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Politicians should only be allowed to speak words that are actually in the dictionary, and they should be forced to form them into coherent thoughts before uttering them..
2006-10-12 00:04:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It already is restrained---you cannot yell fire in a crowded theater unless there is one.
2006-10-11 23:59:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by afsm666 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No,It is what makes us who we are.
2006-10-12 00:18:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by eva b 5
·
0⤊
1⤋