Two: second time could indicate a pattern that does not inspire trust,
2006-10-11 16:19:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lynda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Judging from all these answers, there are either alot of Republicans here, or alot of brainwashed liberals, or alot of LIARS. I mean, is everyone here willing to admit that they have a hard time believing anything Clinton says? Somehow I doubt that considering how far left most Yahoo users are. So are you brainwashed or lying?
2006-10-11 23:23:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Twice - the first time may have been a terrible mistake. The second time was deliberate. If I was still around for the third lie, then I deserve it.
2006-10-11 23:12:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once
2006-10-11 23:09:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If his family is rich enough to get him elected President despite being a C student and a failed businessman, then why would I ever stop trusting him, no matter how many times he lied?
You unpatriotic treasonous terrorist!
2006-10-11 23:10:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by A Box of Signs 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Once. First liar doesn't stand a chance. If someone lies once, clearly lying doesn't bother them. They'll do it again.
2006-10-11 23:10:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by MathGuy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once. Trust is earned. Once breached it must be earned back over time.
2006-10-11 23:10:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by rcpaden 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Second time
2006-10-11 23:09:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once. This video is on the record and not made up
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F6kouXg40Q&mode=related&search
2006-10-11 23:11:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once.
2006-10-11 23:09:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
0⤊
0⤋