English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yes, I admire Che very much(see my 360). And he would give us more freedom if he ran our nation. Too bad CIA trained, 3rd world troops murdered him with no trial.

Bush of Che Guevara....who would give us more freedom?

2006-10-11 15:48:29 · 16 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government Politics

JUDGING BY THE RESPONSES.....Che would give us more freedom!

2006-10-11 15:54:18 · update #1

16 answers

americans are so predictable. i found the exact answers (i'm referring to the ones that condemn support for CHE) here that i was expecting when i first read the question. anyway, you can never go wrong with someone who takes the side of the peasants in society. you can also never hope to achieve anything with an illiterate fascist as a leader (that would be Bush).

2006-10-11 16:02:07 · answer #1 · answered by Pomie 2 · 1 4

Your foolish chatter will accomplish nothing. Your view of the world events, relevant facts, and history is distorted by personal hatreds.

If Che Guevara was the leader of your country, you'd pray for the arrival of someone like George Bush and you'd kneel and kiss his hands when he liberated your country. President Bush would and has ensured your freedom.

2006-10-12 00:23:29 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 2 0

Che Guevara would kill us after he ate at our dinner tables

2006-10-11 22:54:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

It's a toss-up.
Right-wing aspiring dictator, or Left-wing aspiring dictator?

I'll go for Che because he's Argentine, and that place is my second home!

2006-10-11 22:50:46 · answer #4 · answered by A Box of Signs 4 · 2 2

Neither ,
I have no love for Che or Bush ,

2006-10-11 22:57:18 · answer #5 · answered by Fatwa Freddie 3 · 0 2

Guevara would be far better for the USA. He was one of the few true communists. I mourned when he died. (well actually I was not born yet but o well) Bush is a reactionary fascist.

2006-10-11 22:51:30 · answer #6 · answered by Ludwig Wittgenstein 5 · 0 3

Both are just as bad. Both aspired towards big-brother governments. The only difference, one did it with rainbows and flowers, while the other does it with stars and stripes.

2006-10-11 23:06:11 · answer #7 · answered by bradSA 1 · 0 2

I wont even lower myself to answer this stupid question.

IF you think he is so great why don't you move there.

Why do liberals live off capitlalism but hate America, Christians, Capitlalism.
BUT EMBRACE
Terrorists, socialist, communist, dictatorships, corrupt foreign govenments.

2006-10-11 22:52:14 · answer #8 · answered by Rick D 3 · 2 1

Neither. Both were cut from the same cloth and would murder for personal gain in a heart beat.

2006-10-11 22:59:45 · answer #9 · answered by eva b 5 · 0 3

che believed, & look what his equal commie brother fido let happen to him.

it' ok fido is getting closer to judgment!

why don't you go try out cuba, i hear they have great health care!

2006-10-11 22:55:11 · answer #10 · answered by Bonno 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers