the death of Lidel on Bush?
2006-10-11 15:48:14 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Asi2aeHcxWNo2HPfKJrn.2Psy6IX?qid=20061011194139AAp5l93
2006-10-11 15:48:55 · update #1
this is what the damn libs have become HATEMONGERS
2006-10-11 15:49:24 · update #2
why can't damn libs answer a damn question
2006-10-11 15:53:38 · update #3
Oh, my friend. Have I got something for you!! Look at my last question. "To responsible liberal democrats.........." I think it turned out to be better proof of their hate-mongering than I've seen ever. And I really didn't expect it to work out so one sided. But it did. Check it out. To your Q . I absolutely now have no doubt in my mind that almost all of them are like that now.
2006-10-11 16:08:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think it's shameful all the way around, and we as a NATION should be embarrassed by it. The conservatives, in their hatred, blame the liberals for everything that is wrong with America. The liberals blame the conservatives. And they BOTH think that this blame game is just pointless hatred.
If there is one thing I CANNOT stand, it's hypocracy. Until you have learned to look at a liberal without hatred, I think you should stop laying the 'hatemongering' label on them. And if you can't do that, go back to your glass house and lock yourself in.
2006-10-11 23:04:12 · answer #2 · answered by Chredon 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
One crackpot does not speak for everyone who leans liberal just as one crackpot does not speak for everyone who leans conservative.
It's like those Fox-crazed right wing zealots who try to blame Foley on Clinton. Asinine is asinine now matter what the leaning are.
2006-10-11 23:04:58 · answer #3 · answered by franson 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you guys are so funny every question asked pertaining to Bush unless it's pro Bush is always responded to by name calling etc do you actually feel we would blame a plane crash like that on Bush that would mean he had to think alone as no one would have helped him so there's proof he didn't do it
2006-10-11 23:10:38 · answer #4 · answered by katlady927 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
uh... that's a Con posting the question... asking how they will blame it on Bush... and I didn't see anyone take the bait?
so, what's your point? how low cons will go to try and prove a point?
we can't answer the question, because you don't understand that your question is flawed... it's like asking why did hitler turn the sky blue?... you can't answer a question that doesn't make sense...
2006-10-11 22:56:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
LMAO!!!! People are dumber than i thought. Someone rated the first answer with a thumbs up, heck, 4 people did. LMAO!!!
Its actually sad, really
PS: anthonyinc. TheY will not rise again if they face the Tigers again. Go Tigers!
2006-10-11 22:55:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
its funny when you put on the face of a famous liberal in order to mock him call the people you mock hatemongers. Its hillarious when you call the people you hate retards, and say that THEY are the hatemongers. I nearly fall out of my chair laughing when your party and friends accuse Hillary and Bill Clinton of High Treason and murder on one hand, then call liberals hatemongers.
Yeah, hypocrites are really funny!
2006-10-11 22:52:30 · answer #7 · answered by Skippy 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Sounds like a question some of your neocons friends would put up.
And the question is rediculous.
I love the Yankees. Very terrible.
The Yankees will rise again next year!
PS-Cussing is not good for you.
2006-10-11 22:52:47 · answer #8 · answered by Villain 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I would rather be a hate monger than a war mongering monkey!!....
2006-10-11 22:55:42 · answer #9 · answered by ☠Naz☠ 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i dont
2006-10-11 22:59:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋