English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The only confirmed kill of an Al Qaeda terrorist in Iraq that I have seen is Al Zarqarwi and he was replaced in a week and that guy has 25 more guys to back him up if he is killed. That means it is going to take the US military an estimated 75 years to catch all the Iraqi Al Qaeda leaders.

2006-10-11 15:41:47 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Good point...the problem is Bush and his supporters are constantly referring to insurgents,Iraqi Patriots and others who would dare defend their country...as terrorists..So the reality of who is who is lost in translation. We were sold a pack of lies to get us into this war...why are OUR Congress and Senators still letting it continue? All three branches of OUR Government are letting America twist in the wind. Any politician who supported this Lie in Iraq should be fired in November regardless of their party....PRINCIPAL OVER POLITICS

2006-10-11 15:44:48 · answer #1 · answered by dstr 6 · 0 0

communicate approximately taking issues out of content what he pronounced became the "conflict on Terror" is a bumper decal. and he's stable by way of fact calling it that we are able to label something as terror and their isn't any thank you to set benchmarks for fulfillment. all of us comprehend the terrorist who attacked us on 9-11 El Quida. So why not call it the conflict on El Quidia. and then salary conflict on them. prefer to renowned why the Kennedy airport element occurred right this moment? by way of fact Osma Bin landen remains obtainable. why is he nonetheless obtainable? by way of fact we've a bumper decal extremely of the conflict on Bin Landen. yet of direction if we talked approximately because it the conflict on El Quida or the conflict on Bin landen we would not have been able to invade Iraq BTW as a clean Yorker please provide up asserting that the FBI broke this up. The FBI and fatherland risk-free practices ought to not discover my butt. in the event that they have been extremely attracted to assisting long island combat terror we might get extra funds from them then Wyoming does, yet Wyoming is a pink state and the only time the properly suited even looks at long island is as quickly as we are attacked or very practically attacked. THANK GOD we've the NYPD to foil terrorism. and that's who stopped this attack. the properly suited wing media can say FBI till they are blue in the face, New yorker comprehend that when lower back we owe it to the girls and adult men people of the long island city Police branch

2016-10-16 02:31:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No, because the number of ENEMIES we have killed never gets reported anymore. That would only show that we are actually WINNING this war. For some reason we are not allowed to win wars anymore because so many think that we are on the side of evil. It is what is now, and in the future, destroying this country. What ever happened to pride in your country. Go ahead Libs, say Bush destoyed it, we know it's coming......................give me a break.

2006-10-11 15:59:44 · answer #3 · answered by C D 2 · 0 1

we've killed dozens of Al-quaida in Iraq. The problem is, most of them wouldnt' have joined Al-quaida if we hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place.

2006-10-11 15:49:03 · answer #4 · answered by Skippy 6 · 0 0

Well if we're using W's definition of terrorist, we've killed about 655,000 of them!

2006-10-11 15:49:38 · answer #5 · answered by A Box of Signs 4 · 0 0

None, but they've managed to kill plenty of innocent civilians.

2006-10-11 16:19:19 · answer #6 · answered by Aussie Chick 5 · 0 0

as if you would ever get a straight answer out of this current administration,when they don't know they say its VAGUE!!

2006-10-11 15:56:15 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1 1

Go to DOD.gov and get your figures.,

2006-10-11 15:44:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers