http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/30/education/30teacher.html?ei=5090&en=72efd1846b3947bd&ex=1317268800&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
2006-10-11 14:50:02 · 5 answers · asked by lemnlimelinoleum 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
That's sad that the school system would do that. It sounds like there is someone there with too much power, and is on a big power trip. Hopefully, with the publicity the issue is getting, another school system will snatch this teacher up and give her even better opportunities.
Too many narrow PC minds out there!
2006-10-11 14:58:03 · answer #1 · answered by poppet 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It just goes to show you to what extremes these whacko fundamentalists will go to protect their children from: a) the real world b) life c) the naked body d) original thought.
2006-10-11 22:00:47 · answer #2 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah sadly censorship in america is stupid. i mean next year in 6th grade he's going to learn about the reproductive system. why?
parents just like to complain.
but at least they have art, since the deficent in california, art is basically gone
2006-10-11 22:49:41 · answer #3 · answered by gets flamed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think its bs too... its a statue. its art. its not showing 2 people f*cking on the kitchen counter its showing the human body. and plus they see worse in health class.. i swear the US is getting too uptight.. and parents are too
2006-10-11 22:02:01 · answer #4 · answered by Dont get Infected 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looking at a naked statute is different than watching some porno flick. They are overreacting.
2006-10-11 21:53:03 · answer #5 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋