I know this is a small plane, and im not an engineer, but seeing these, and comparing it to the planes of September 11, i cant help but wonder if the jets of 9/11 would have really brought down the 3 buildings, including WTC7????
2006-10-11 14:37:27 · 13 answers · asked by bernardmailman 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
To be honest with you i think everything that was said about 9/11 was complete bulls**t. The planes wouldnt have brought that building down and even though bin laden was known for doing evil, i belive that the u.s. government planned 9/11 and most people can concider me crazy but if you go to youtube.com and find some of the videos on there you can see why i belive 9/11 2 be a bunch of s**t
2006-10-11 14:50:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
I am not an expert either, but I think the fuel capacity differences in the planes alone would be a great factor. Also, the apartment building isnt the same height or age as the towers and that would have alot to do with it also. I think the sheer force that the towers were hit at the height they were hit made a difference as well. What kind of idea do you have about it?
2006-10-11 21:45:10 · answer #2 · answered by Kellie W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously you are no engineer, the difference between a single engine plane and multi engined jet might make a bit of a difference. A b-24 hit the Empire State Building in 1944 and barely shook it. It took a pair of wide body jets to take down the world trade centers. Don't be stupid.
2006-10-11 21:41:18 · answer #3 · answered by Zivien 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Um, come on dummy...those planes a) were MUCH bigger b) held a very large amount of fuel c) hit buildings that were straighter and taller, making them more unstable the higher up you go and d) those buildings were hit a lot higher than this small plane hit the apartments and e) the 9/11 planes hit the towers at a much faster speed than this plane probably did.
2006-10-11 21:51:28 · answer #4 · answered by james p 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about? The little plane had gas in it and weighed about as much as a car. The 9/11 planes were passenger jets filled with thousands of gallons of explosive jet fuel, and they weighed as much as or more than a house. It's like comparing a firecracker to dynamite.
2006-10-11 21:40:45 · answer #5 · answered by kevvsworld 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What? The plane he was in was very small. Small planes used to crash into the twin towers all the time. but last time it was big planes, hi jacked planes.
2006-10-12 00:49:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
without a doubt.....just like a firecracker compared to a stick of dynamite...the small plane was nothing compared to the jumbos of 9/11....really blows your mind....to be there would have really messed anybody up.
2006-10-11 21:47:00 · answer #7 · answered by qckdrw 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Small plane fuel compared to a fully loaded tank of jet fuel....
2006-10-11 21:40:04 · answer #8 · answered by Grundoon 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
September 11 was planned, this crash today was an accident. Now God is telling the nation to know the truth about 9/11. This building was also much smaller than the twin tower, and should have come down.
2006-10-11 21:40:24 · answer #9 · answered by miamian 3 · 0⤊ 7⤋
This question is not even worth answering. All you need is just a little common sense to figure this one out.
2006-10-11 21:47:01 · answer #10 · answered by suk_on_my_glock 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋