No they won't - they will still be looking for WMD in Iraq and blame Bill Clinton because it happened. We will still be trying to bring Democracy to a place that doesn't want it instead of helping a poor country like Darfur.
2006-10-11 14:40:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by MrsMike 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Terrorist hated the USA Before GWB ever took office. If you think back I'm sure you can recall several attacks that happened under a Democratic President who served not all that long ago. As for N Korea and there Nukes. Be Honest with yourself for One moment and look at it seriously without Hatred of GWB. Bill Clinton attempted to resolve this issue. N Korea pulled one over on him. That doesn't excuse or take away some of the Blame that lies with GWB as well. Its OK to be a Dem or a Lib or whatever you wanna be BUT,,,,, You should be an AMERICAN first. When one cares More for there political party than they do America thats SAD and It doesn't matter if it's a DEM or a REP. Be careful your walking dangerously close to that edge. The Honest answer to your question is BOTH parties have Blame to be placed for N Korea.
2006-10-11 14:41:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rather interesting Kerry thinks we should do what the world thinks we should with a total coalition, unless a small nation wants to talk to us solely - strange so many buy into it.
I know the Democrats secretly wanted the US to nuke them 1st. How one nukes anyone secretively is news to me.
If the Democrat would offer up viable alternatives, they might get elected. When the Republicans offered up Dole to run against Clinton, they basically conceded the election to the fool.
2006-10-11 14:48:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rand and Ron Paul are starting to be the Libertarian message out. enable's relax and watch genuine small authorities advocates spring up. i won't be in a position to attend to start up dismantling this huge, unconstitutional authorities created by utilising the two Democrats and Republicans. Rand Paul's win would be a extensive victory for Libertarians. i could not be any happier!
2016-12-16 06:16:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by coman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't worry about it. Nukes are not as powerful as military contractors make them out to be.
Now if Bush could get NASA to grab a Comet and smack it into the Mideast that would be more of the Biblical proportion explosion that Redpublicans want and pray for.
Go big Red Go
2006-10-11 14:39:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think it was Carter and Clinton who gave N. Korea the ability to make a nuke. More lib revisionist history.
2006-10-11 14:56:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeff F 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm shocked that you think Republicans decided North Korea should have nukes. We didn't cause anything...the blame lies in several countries. Nice try? Pfff
2006-10-11 14:34:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Squawkers 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes they will see, but they will not believe it unless Rush Limbaugh says it is so. That will never happen so they will remain in the dark as usual. They still think that voting for a coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals is a good thing.
2006-10-11 14:39:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
If we get nuked it's becaue the Liberal Democrankies have convinced the rest of the world that we're all ******* like them. All their whining is dragging us down like it did the French Surrender Monkies.
2006-10-11 14:36:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
We are on the path to the correct place. The only way we end terrorism is to kill them. I would rather kill them then wait for them to kill us. BTW, the liberal message of today is the same problem we had before WWII. Ignore evil in the world as long as it is not in our backyard.
2006-10-11 14:35:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
2⤊
2⤋