That artist(mainly the singer) in a live concert sound absolutely terrible but sound very well in CD's. Examples are almost any of the new music today. Marilyn Manson, Insane Clown Posse, Dope, Ashlee Simpson, and countless others. Are we really listening to fake artist with no talent? At this rate, anyone could make a s.h.itty record and edit it and sell millions of copies. (AKA rap).
2006-10-11 14:13:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Due to the fact that the recording industry is so utterly focussed on generating money, it's no wonder that today's 'talent' (or lack thereof) are totally exposed when it comes to playing live. In past decades when consumerism hadn't yet washed over aboslutely everything, talent was a necessity to any possible success in movies or music. Nowadays it's all about marketability and product-placement. Consequently 'artists' like Ashlee Simpson are destined to be crap once the filters and effects are applied to their voice.
2006-10-11 14:25:30 · answer #1 · answered by Kble 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HAHA, Ashlee Simpson suCKS!
She started out trying to be everything her sister is not. And she tried to be pop princess meets punk and now shes just a Jessica clone with a worse singing voice (and loTTTs of plastic surgery). *cough* sell out *cough*
Other then that, my answer would be yes. Thats why I listen to Pink Floyd and The Beatles (etc.)
2006-10-11 14:20:03 · answer #2 · answered by Jillian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
These days it's all about the way they look, unfortunately. I agree they have no talent. They make all this money selling their crappy records, which I think is stupid. I listen to country music & classic rock, because I can't stand today's crap.
2006-10-11 14:28:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hm...i've got continually questioned a sprint approximately it, yet you're appropriate! you have an rather prepared eye and ideas! great job! i think of that Kevin is extra out of their aim merchandising variety so as that they think of of him as much less significant; i'm no longer asserting I dislike Kevin..only proving a factor. yet there is likewise Zac Efron...he's 21....nicely, i don't get why the editors try this. and that i think of that he's warm only like Nick and Joe. Joe is eighteen and he remains warm, and Kevin is only a trifling 2 years aside and that makes him gruesome??? what's up with that??? Zac Efron is 21 so does that make him gruesome, too? only as a results of fact Kevin is older does no longer make him gruesome. And this makes me sense undesirable. Kevin is probably no longer my admired, yet remains portion of the band and merits to be taken care of with admire. Why do human beings try this? this is talked approximately as empathy...it does not sense stable...ever! Starred circumstances 10!
2016-12-08 13:09:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i did notice that with fall out boys a little less 16 candles a little more touch me.they sound a lot better when the studio recorders adds and subtracts sounds
2006-10-11 15:15:06 · answer #5 · answered by hockiee.girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Offspring, Slaughter and Van Halen are bad live too.
Motley Crue, Santana and quite a few others are pretty darn good live.
2006-10-11 14:21:57 · answer #6 · answered by madbaldscotsman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ya they have several takes and re-takes for the same lines and cut-paste the best lines together in a recording studio. they can't do that in real life.
2006-10-11 14:24:47 · answer #7 · answered by GAWD 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
recording studios can make almost anyone sound good
2006-10-11 14:15:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋