Too long. I appreciate the original more and more.
2006-10-11 13:54:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by nobody 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peter Pan and Michael Jackson have not something to do with one yet another. that's in basic terms the institutions that media has created to handle this emotionally stunted guy. Peter Pan is a narrative with regard to the youngster in all people and our perception in magical lands. Michael Jackson is a narrative with regard to the excesses of present day existence and how they function to cushion a paedophile from something of society.
2016-10-16 02:26:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by scharber 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither loved nor hated, but liked it pretty well. It was best to be viewed on the big screen because it was a BIG movie. Big effects, big action, big monsters. I could make a joke about Jack Black but won't, because I actually think he's kinda cute.
Anyway, it was pretty good, but I'm convinced it will be comparatively much less effective on tv.
2006-10-11 13:57:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Haven't seen it yet. Saw the original on a big movie screen. Doubt he'll ace that. Amazing, ain't it?
2006-10-11 13:51:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by vanamont7 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i liked it (not loved it) because they made an old type of movie in a new visually superior way, the same types of shots and way of speaking and acting as in movies from the old days, when they were black and white
2006-10-11 13:50:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by zitro_divad 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the actual king kong part was good :-)
2006-10-11 13:54:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by .crescent.moon. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too much time in New York!!
2006-10-11 13:55:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
was about an hour an a half too long
2006-10-11 13:55:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by kmpaige86 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hated it, found it so boring I did not watch all of it.
2006-10-11 15:02:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by MUD 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
its good in the beginning but it gets really old fast.
2006-10-11 13:54:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by ag 3
·
0⤊
0⤋