English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20.1'' Samsung SyncMaster Monitor™ (204B) $299 after $50 rebate.
20.1” UXGA display 1600 x 1200 resolution 5 ms response time.
photo>>> http://www.circuitcity.com/IMAGE/product/enlarged/sam/EC.SAM.204B.JPG

Westinghouse 20.1" Flat-Panel LCD Monitor Model: LCM-20V5
1400 x 1050 maximum resolution price $ 299 no rebate.
8 ms response time
PHOTO>> http://images.bestbuy.com/BestBuy_US/images/products/7638/7638238_ra.jpg

which one of this will be good and last for long? what you think about viewsonic LCD monitors?

2006-10-11 13:41:58 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Hardware Monitors

6 answers

Thats a no brainer,Samsung all the way rebate or no rebate.Viewsonic is better than westinghouse

2006-10-11 13:46:44 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Go with the Samsung. The high resolution and fast response time will really help out a lot.

2006-10-11 14:43:07 · answer #2 · answered by eric_bev 2 · 0 0

I would go with the Samsung, it has a better response time and a better contrast ratio. Both should be dependable, but in my opinion the Samsung is better.

2006-10-11 13:49:39 · answer #3 · answered by mysticman44 7 · 0 0

each and every element else being equivalent, the version between Contrasts of a million,000:a million and 50,000:a million ought to look that fifty,000 is extra helpful, in spite of the fact that the a million,000 is a Static (ratio between Black and White) and 50,000 is Dynamic (gained by making use of making use of adjusting the decrease back-basic intensity looking on displayed intensities). in case you divide 1366 by making use of making use of 768 you will see that it particularly is resembling sixteen divided by making use of making use of 9 = a million.778, it particularly is the style you tell what ratio it somewhat is.

2016-10-19 05:52:51 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I would get the Viewsonic myself.

I've had nothing but good experiences with them.

2006-10-11 13:51:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i would not get either one, the picture quality is poor on lcd's and the refresh rate is slow as well, if you watch videos or play openGL games, you will be disappointed.

2006-10-11 13:50:17 · answer #6 · answered by simplemod400 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers