Why are liberals upset with us invading Iraq, but....?

Question

cannot wait for us invade N.Kkorea?

Or is just more blame on Bush they can use for their propoganda?

Answer 1

The liberals don't want to invade N. Korea. that don't have the balls to invade a terrorists privacy to protect Americans. They want to see us do something rash, so that they can complain and put another moron in the white house. (sorry W lovers) The truth is we need a good solid leader, like Ronald Reagan. And George has done alright , and I think Clinton did a fine job as well. But they all screw up. And there isn't a damn one of you that could do, or find someone to do any better.

Answer 2

It isn't so much that we (ahem, liberal here) can't wait to invade N Korea, or that all of us disliked the war in Iraq, it is just that Bush is being a hypocrite. He went into Iraq on the grounds that they had WMDs. North Korea has long been developing WMDs and buying/ enriching Plutonium. When we found out that there were no WMDs in Iraq Bush said it was a war for Freedom and that the people are better off now. Thee people of North Korea are so malnourished that they are almost hereditarily short, and they have even less freedom than the Iraqis had. Finally, Bush has started talking about "negotiating", and "Diplomacy first", and he has been saying this for a while about N. Korea. He didn't wait for any diplomacy in Iraq. Democrats aren't bloodthirsty or anything, but North Korea would have been an appropriate time to use military force, the Bush administration not doing so seems to make the war in Iraq appear to have been motivated by oil, not security or freedom.

Answer 3

Who told you liberals want to invade N. Korea. Did you just make that up? Did you suppose that the criticism of Bush for invading Iraq on speculation and not invading N. Korea on certain fact means something other than that he misled foreign policy and is hypocritical?

Had he paid attention and had he not been so hell bent to avenge his daddy, he would have realized that the North Koreans reneged on the deal we offered and got in there with some effective solutions, instead of going off half-****** on some vendetta that got us bogged down and created a workshop for terrorists and neglecting real threats.

Answer 4

liberals do not want north korea invaded - it would seem that the subtley of their argument is lost on you.

people are upset about the invasion, destruction, occupation of iraq - not just liberals. search 'conservatives against the war' or 'conservatives against bush' and you will find plenty on google.
one reason conservatives as well as liberals are against bush is he's been draining our treasury since the start of his war to the tune of a billion a week - and billions are unaccounted for. Did you know that? that would buy a bit of universal health care...

our military admits we tortured and killed at least two dozen innocent people in iraqi prisons. why doesn't this turn your stomach? why do you think there's propaganda - the facts are sickening enough. watching alberto gonzales defend this torture, make fun of the geneva convention, advocate the violation of our constitution is stomach turning to any american who loves her country and understands what it's about.

this war we started has killed 660,000 iraqi civilians - many thousands from us illegally dropping bombs on civilian neighborhoods. we've illegally destroyed their power and their water and their bridges and their schools and their hospitals and their museums and remember, we're liberating them!!!!

so - the reason you think anyone is advocating invading north korea is because they are pointing out one more example that shows how much bush lied about his reasons for going to war in iraq. he is a lying, thieving, torturing, mass murdering gangster and the side which has been putting out propaganda is his - aren't you aware of the reporters found to be taking big dollars to promote bush programs? or the big dollars the bush admint spent producing 'news segments' that have been shown on local news all around the country?

it's really sad to see a question that shows an utter confidence in one's position and an utter unfamiliarity with facts related to this position.

Answer 5

first of all, i replaced into neither of the thoughts you defined. I knew that it replaced into going to be an prolonged conflict, yet, I additionally knew we've been doing it for the appropriate motives. Saddam replaced into shutting out the UN inspectors and we did locate remnants of WMD supplies. we've liberated a us of a from a cruel dictator. We nevertheless have some extra artwork to do to assist the hot government in stabalizing the rustic so as that the few ultimate Saddam loyalists do not create a civil conflict. All i can declare is that i'm lots prouder as an American now than i replaced into 8 years in the past.

Answer 6

Bush did the wrong thing. How many Americans have died in Iraq? Do you think that is right, just and fair.

Answer 7

They are only happy if they have someone to bash, criticize, bad mouth. I often wonder if these people have jobs or do they all live in shacks, live off welfare (that is way that want higher taxes) and sit all day reading hate blogs.

I don't care of they are Dem or Rep. but their comments and hate filled speech and writing shows their uneducated, ignorant, bitter people who are not happy unless they are trying to drag others down.

Answer 8

i didnt now liberals wanted 2 invade n korea, it sounds like you just labl ppl as liberals if they dont agree with your opinion

Answer 9

you are kidding and do you plan on joining the military anytime soon????because if you did go in the military you would not be trying to be rfunny like this now.

Answer 10

I think it all comes down to this:

one country has nuclear weapons

one country does not