2006-10-11 12:46:18 · 13 answers · asked by Pharmalolli 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
You have to show that x is related to y in some manner other than time for it to be considered a cause.
2006-10-11 12:50:24 · answer #1 · answered by Sophist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
frequently for here: a million. the variety of surprising launch: Black 2 and White 2 got here out purely approximately 3 months in the past, and already they are sending us a sparkling interest in the previous some human beings have even finished the final 2. 2. No RSE remake: human beings needed a Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald remake in the previous a sparkling era got here out. 3. they might have long gone on with gen 5: some human beings think of that they stopped gen 5 in the previous they gave it a desirable ultimately. It looked that the plot became not over from the previous interest, exceptionally for the explanation that Ghetsis have been given away yet yet again! On desirable of that, human beings needed interest Freak to bypass added into the thought Reshiram and Zekrom have been as quickly as one pokemon, and Kyurem is the physique of that previous pokemon. Many needed to confirm an extremely final, maximum suitable fusion of Reshiram, Zekrom, and Kyurem.
2016-11-27 23:17:16 · answer #2 · answered by kimsey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can say anything you'd like, but should you say it?
If X happens before Y, what happened in the interval between X and Y?
If I hit a car fender with a mallet, is the formation of the dent an event after the mallet strikes or is the formation of the dent simultaneous with the mallet strike? Aren't causes simultaneous with their effects?
2006-10-11 12:49:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. If so then every event now would have to be caused by every event in the past. I doubt that you getting bullied in third grade (or being the bully, you meanie) caused me to eat the can of tuna fish I just had cuz I won't get time for dinner tonight.
2006-10-11 13:02:09 · answer #4 · answered by larry n 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
x caused a a reprocess of something, thenthe reprocessing may lead to y, but not neccesarily be the cause of y...y could have happened first,and starded the same process that x did...is death the cause of life.....life causes life........y happened because the circumstances where right for it..........and y produced another change
2006-10-11 12:58:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. You haven't proven causality...
"The Hindenberg disaster happened before Woodstock, therefore the Hindenberg's accident caused Woodstock."
See the problem?
2006-10-11 12:57:53 · answer #6 · answered by Stephen F 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
if x=2y+37 then does a (y+ coyote) = a grapefruit minus the peel?
2006-10-11 12:56:37 · answer #7 · answered by Donald W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
x becomes before y ,cause x was there first in the alphabet
2006-10-11 12:54:24 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not necessarily. Maybe X just arrived at the scene of the crime first.
2006-10-11 12:52:26 · answer #9 · answered by dudezoid 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Too little information.
2006-10-11 12:56:36 · answer #10 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋