Most presidents would beam with pride over those numbers.
650K dead Iraqi's beat that Bill Clinton lovers.
2006-10-11 11:34:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
When did you become a terrorist supporter, 43? I'm not surprised.
2006-10-11 15:00:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG, he's like no other President in the history of the United States of America. He will go down in the history books as a madman; out of control; out of touch with reality; able to send innocent soldiers to their death to revenge his father's honor; destroying the economy; contradicting his platform on fighting terrorist, while leaving our borders unsecured; lying to the public about the 911 Commission Report; deviant behavior that instituted the outing of a CIA operative and several other agents; kicking out the Country's best Secretary of State: Colin Powell; undermining of education (No Child Left Behind; right!); and what about the Congress being so busy to help Bush-Gone-Wild to take away are 6th Amendment Right, while Mark Foley went about his pedophile ways. I'm just so proud of him!
2006-10-11 18:47:47 · answer #2 · answered by Swordfish 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm affraid that youre interpreting that number all wrong.
Sorry.
That number does not reflect how many innocent Iraqis have died as result of American armed forces. That number reflects innocent Iraqis killed as a result of the war between Islamic fanatics and American involvement in what religious folk consider, Islamic territory.
The majority of those numbers you see are actually the innocents that have been killed by extremists or terrorist attempting to injure and kill armed forces.
A very very small percentage of that number is actually innocent citizens being slaughtered by armed forces in Iraq. Probably about 0.02 percent or so.
2006-10-11 18:47:27 · answer #3 · answered by Clark W Griswold 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you missed the part of the study that said it could be off by 400,000 to 800,000 since the study was done by interviewing just 1,000 Iraqi families asking how many in their family. They take that number guesstimate to that magic number of 600,000 or so and in tiny print give the error of over under....don't always believe what you hear or read.
"But it is an estimate and not a precise count, and researchers acknowledged a margin of error that ranged from 426,369 to 793,663 deaths."
2006-10-11 18:41:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You f u c k i n g idiot! Who would be proud of killing 650,000 people. they are no different. we are not better than them...no one is...bush is an idiot...i know of some other number you could post...how about the national deficit..now that is something worth arguing about...i am sure us Bill Clinton lovers COULD beat that...what do you think?
2006-10-11 18:43:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Compare to what the free world lost in WWII son.
And those figures are wrong and you know it.
Why not just make it a round Billion? Makes as much sense.
Freedom isn't free kid.
2006-10-11 18:39:01 · answer #6 · answered by John16 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is nothing to be proud of when 650,000 civilians have died.
The situation in Iraq is very serious, and a new plan for peace is needed.
2006-10-11 18:37:37 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Not only the most humble, but he's also made NO MISTAKES that he can think of!
Can't we repeal the constitutional ammendment and have him for another 2 terms? If we just had his administration for another 2 terms, I'm sure we'd own the whole world by 2016! Then all our problems would be GONE.
2006-10-11 18:39:14 · answer #8 · answered by Jerry 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Those are dead PEOPLE! Civilians are most definetly included in that count. There's nothing to brag about. He's responsible for murder.
2006-10-11 18:39:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Are you serious? 650,000 Iraqis killed?
2006-10-11 18:38:42 · answer #10 · answered by AntiDisEstablishmentTarianism 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋