without the building collapsing, Doesn't that say something about 9/11
2006-10-11 09:56:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Probably it was being flown by one of James Dean or Marc Bolan's offspring.
Wasn't there a similarly disillusioned poor little rich kid in Florida who flew a Cessna into a building just after 911? Life for me is soo tough. Which $100k sports car do I take to school today, I can't take the pressure, I got to do some thing radical etc etc....
It's just like the Irish terrorists crashing the good year blimp in to Canary Wharf in a copycat attack.
2006-10-11 11:16:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is out really amazing about this is . that on Fox News the guy from the FAA says that they don't bother about flights under 1500 feet...No radar is used only Visual.... Bin Lah-Lah if you are watching... you are free to strike at any building - the Government wont bother you... Madness !
2006-10-11 17:02:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No it says something about the difference of the energy in a big plane to that in a small one.
2006-10-11 17:01:48 · answer #3 · answered by "Call me Dave" 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it does say something about 911...It was well planned., With large planes..going faster..more fuel load. This is not comparing apples to apples.. Sherlock.!..smaller plane..slower....not the fire load...(less fuel)
2006-10-11 17:02:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Should've watched news
2006-10-11 18:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by Lewisthelab 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What are you on about Mathew?
2006-10-11 17:06:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, unless you are one of these conspiracy theorists....
2006-10-11 16:59:02 · answer #7 · answered by BenignSource 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋