English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They where there to capture both planes......i dont see why there was camera crews there...

2006-10-11 09:41:48 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

The first one was a pair of brothers filming in the street at a firehouse they were doing a documentary on the life of a fireman.the cameraman heard the news and looked up . The second one naturally would have been covered because the whole world was watching the result of the first crash. The pentagan photos were from a still security camera.

2006-10-11 09:44:23 · answer #1 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 1 0

Wow chill all.

The second plane coverage is not all that surprising after the first strike.

And the only good footage of the first is from a documentary that was filming... which even in a city that size is remarkable... except it was a documentary on the first attack in the 90's!

Which can be considered interesting and used to support either side of the 'conspiracy'.

So first was luck the rest were 'response' cameras.

2006-10-11 09:54:59 · answer #2 · answered by uncledad 3 · 0 0

once you have 15 million people crowded onto a tiny island 1000's have cameras, fairly travelers. The loud roar of a airplane over long island would have brought about many to look in that direction lots of them with cameras, in basic terms in time to seize the airplane hitting the area of the tower. No secret right here! ABC's information instruct solid Morning, us of a had cameras skilled on the skyline of long island city that morning because of the fact it exchange right into a pleasing sunny morning and it made for a competent back drop for their information courses. NBC's as we communicate exchange into on the air and had the towers based at the back of Katie Couric and Matt Lauer that morning whilst the 1st airplane hit. They concept is exchange into purely a hearth intense up in the towers.

2016-12-16 06:08:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The second hit was supposedly fimed as a result of cameras being on site after the first.
The first hit, which wasn't shown on TV until the next day, was from a film by the Naudet brothers, who were reported to be filing a documentary about the fire service, and 'coincidentally!' caught the first hit on film.

2006-10-12 14:04:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ok dude, the footage was captured by tourists w/ camcorders. the planes came in flying extremely low, they started to follow them w/ the camcorder, into the buildings. they weren't professionals. anything you see that is professional was done with special effects.

2006-10-11 09:42:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

there weren't the film video was taken by people who were on vacation or just happened to be there with cameras and cam corders

2006-10-11 09:44:25 · answer #6 · answered by darkangel1111 5 · 1 0

Dude cameras are everywhere, why do so many idiots believe that there was some conspiracy, geez won't the democrates give it a break

2006-10-11 09:44:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The city is full of tourists every day....

2006-10-11 09:45:38 · answer #8 · answered by Katz 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers