How come the war on terrorism didn't start with Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma?

Question

Shouldn't terrorism be fought regardless of its origin.
There were no color charts, anti-terrorism budgets or round ups of mlilitia memners.

Answer 1

Was that the first act of terror you were able to find. I'm sure you can find some more if you look back farther.

The point you are trying to make is ignorant. There are groups of terrorists in this world whose sole purpose in life are to destroy the U.S.

Answer 2

the explanation it did no longer start up in April of 1995 is that "warfare" via its basic utilization, is directed at "them", an identifiable enemy. McVeigh became a white American, and there became no thank you to portray him otherwise. additionally, McVeigh subscribed to differences of (tremendously much mainstream) conservatism: that government became evil. So, his political ilk could have had its militant factor (which the conservatives tried desperately to distance themselves from), even nonetheless it became nevertheless misanthropic and zenophobic and detrimental. besides this, there is the uncomplicated certainty that a central authority construction in distant Oklahoma and the international commerce midsection in manhattan city are somewhat unequal. however the "looking a 'them'" reason is the fundamental.

Answer 3

You're missing the point. We need to fight the terrorists over there so that we can keep them from bringing the fight here. Didn't you get the memo?

Answer 4

Two words, Bill Clinton.

Answer 5

cause Tim McVeigh didnt have oil in his backyard

Answer 6

It did, just ask Timothy if you don't believe me.