Wait a second, going by 9/11 physics... why hasn't the building COLLAPSED YET???
2006-10-11 08:59:41 · 10 answers · asked by rjakjr 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
That date flip upside-down theory is creative and all but Arabic language doesn't have the same characters as we do for NUMBERS. No, I'm not over-reacting, I think it's hillarious it hasn't collapsed yet... you do realize before 9/11 no skyscraper--IN THE WORLD--collapsed due to a plane crash and/or on fire as we were told the world trade towers did on 9/11... only in America right???
2006-10-11 09:11:35 · update #1
As if now, no one knows any thing. They are merely speculating for the TV channels.
This much I know. There is no gaping hole. The cross window beams are still intact. There is a small pile of junk burning on the ground. There is a big charred mark on the building extending 10-12 floors below the crash floors, probably from spilled fuel catching fire.
No one knows enough to rule out terrorism at this point.
2006-10-11 09:08:38 · answer #1 · answered by Gentle Dragon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok, For a detrimental boob who is familiar with no longer something approximately planes. what's the version between a jet-engine & a turbine engine? And if some thing like a chook (or a pen, in accordance to Leveretth) flying right into a turbine engine could make it mal-functionality, why are they so uncovered that birds or debris can fly into them? I recommend, it truly is glaring that contained in the ambience there are birds and debris flying approximately. So are u all asserting that each and every time I holiday, i'm risking my existence to an uncovered turbine engine that could be destroyed by potential of an merchandise the dimensions of a goose (or a pen)? (certainly this could be a query/reaction to Leveretth, Dominic, Pondfis & Thatguy.)
2016-10-02 04:59:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's The Bell Air building. The reason it has not collapsed yet, is it probably wasn't a big enough crash to take it down. Thank God for that!
2006-10-11 09:03:16 · answer #3 · answered by Jim F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NEW YORK - A plane crash has been reported on Manhattan's Upper East Side<<
Why is it that the media insists on toying with our emotions with these bogus and embellished stories and headlines..It also amazes me how the public is clinching on to the hopes of something tragic happening ..just look at all of the questions posted about this..
my heart go out to any victims that may have been involved but come on..I KNOW WE LIVE IN SCARY TIMES BUT LETS NOT OVER REACT!
2006-10-11 09:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by Missbribri 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I say ppl please calm down not all plane crash into high rises are terrorists attacks. I mean there has always been concern way way before 9/11 that the high rise buildings may pose a hazard to planes geeze.
2006-10-11 09:11:32 · answer #5 · answered by wheels302001 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
cause the government didn't put explosives into this building like they did on 9-11
2006-10-11 11:20:46 · answer #6 · answered by Zoe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the building was build in a different time this building that was build in the 80s
2006-10-11 09:07:26 · answer #7 · answered by lilshorty3088 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you take todays date in number form and turn it upside down...what do you have...10-11-06...= 9-11-01
2006-10-11 09:05:05 · answer #8 · answered by emotional misstres 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because it was not a big plane, and the damage wasn't that big .
2006-10-11 09:09:47 · answer #9 · answered by boopadoo 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because it wouldnt accomplish anything
2006-10-11 09:08:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋