As an advisor who would make all the decisions and steer us out of this mess.
2006-10-11 08:57:04 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I doubt even Clinton could fix Bush's disaster.
2006-10-11 09:02:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Oh sure get the one who is partly to blame for what's wrong to fix it. lol Er no Clinton is one of the best EX presidents we've ever had. I'm amazed that some people pick a man of no or not too many moral values who is a slick talker ( a trait honed from years of trying to talk women out of their clothes) that promises you everything but never delivered anything. Sorry I'd rather have a leader who maybe isn't the best speaker and not the brightest star in the sky but who is at least honest and has the welfare of the Amrican people as a priorty over the pencil in his pants.
2006-10-11 09:07:07 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
he's attempting, yet Republicans in the domicile won't enable him. Obama needs to repair the financial device, yet Republicans do no longer want Obama to get that credit. it somewhat is why they have been pushing for the two financial device-stifling austerity measures or an financial device-destroying default on our public debt. The warfare in Iraq is over, and the warfare in Afghanistan would be accomplished quickly. possibly shall we've pulled out of Afghanistan by way of now if Bush hadn't omitted Afghanistan for see you later, obsessing over Iraq rather. i do no longer see how the form is being destroyed by way of Obama. I never believed 2d modification protections have been absolute. i'm plenty extra worried with regard to the unconstitutional way Republicans are enjoying quickly and unfastened with the credibility individuals debt, threatening default in ordinary terms to fabricate leverage in financial debates. That smells a sprint too very equivalent to hostage-taking and terrorism for my convenience.
2016-12-08 12:59:13 · answer #3 · answered by girardot 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What in God's name makes you think Clinton could fix the mess that has been created? You are more stupid than you appear if that is what you think. We need an honest politician (I know, I have a better chance catching a Leprechaun) who is willing to work for the best interests of the country. I got news for you, that person isn't Clinton.
2006-10-11 09:00:29 · answer #4 · answered by matt b 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
1. there is no mess 2. you want the U.S. held hostage again. clinton was a popular president bush said he soesn't want to be known as a popular but as a doer besides democrats are running for their lives now. I'm an indepenent
2006-10-11 09:03:21 · answer #5 · answered by larryclay2006 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I hate to say it, but I think the mess that Bush has made would take a lot more then Clinton to fix. Bush has set this country back decades.
2006-10-11 09:02:07 · answer #6 · answered by BWLJ 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, he was responsible for allot of this mess, see Korean Nuclear bomb.
Bush is no better.
2006-10-11 09:00:49 · answer #7 · answered by Zen 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Clinton would ruin what Bush has done great to this country!
2006-10-11 08:59:17 · answer #8 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The Sixties are over. Nobody hip does hallucinogenics anymore.
2006-10-11 09:02:31 · answer #9 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What mess?
2006-10-11 09:28:01 · answer #10 · answered by Meow the cat 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋