They won't get ahold of a big plane again. Even if they did, it would be shot down. They have to try a new stradgety.
2006-10-11 08:50:27 · 7 answers · asked by Ha Ha Charade You Are................... 4 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Okay guys, obviousley, there are going to be thoughts of terrorism. Why is everyone saying that there's anything wrong with that. This is New York City, think about what happened there exactly 5 years and one month ago. I would link it to terrorism right away if I was there as well.
I don't think that there is anything wrong with "over-reacting" to this. As long as this over-reaction doesn't lead us into unneccessary action. It's okay to be scared.
2006-10-11 09:00:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NEW YORK - A plane crash has been reported on Manhattan's Upper East Side<<
Why is it that the media insists on toying with our emotions with these bogus and embellished stories and headlines..It also amazes me how the public is clinching on to the hopes of something tragic happening ..just look at all of the questions posted about this..
my heart go out to any victims that may have been involved but come on..I KNOW WE LIVE IN SCARY TIMES BUT LETS NOT OVER REACT!
2006-10-11 08:53:28 · answer #2 · answered by Missbribri 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They want to do things that cause lots of death and damage. A small plane doesn't cut it.
2006-10-11 08:54:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A better question would be :Why does everyone assume that every accident is an act of terrorism.It makes us look like we are afraid of our own shadow.
2006-10-11 08:54:50 · answer #4 · answered by eva b 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know...because their heads are up there a#$. I am so very sad right now. My heart cries for the man who tried to save his pregnant wife. I hope that she will be okay.
2006-10-11 08:59:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you trying to take the blame for this one
2006-10-11 08:57:56 · answer #6 · answered by Jester 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think it is a terrorist attack until proved otherwise.
2006-10-11 08:59:38 · answer #7 · answered by exile 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋