English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

they wouldn't be the team they are now, but they also wouldn't be that far away from what they are

2006-10-11 08:54:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Right, with out Chad Johnson, T.J. Who is Your Mama would not have got SO many open passes. Palmer gets more options. Rudi Johnson could follow through with the opened up running game because the passing game is dangerous for the opposing defense.

2006-10-11 16:48:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They would be just as good. They have great recievers and an improving defense.

Chad Johnson is good but now that he's the focus, he's not having a good year.

Rudy Johnson and Palmer are the ones they can't do without.

2006-10-11 16:29:23 · answer #3 · answered by Ice4444 5 · 0 0

Isn't that pretty obvious? Take one of the star players off any team and they won't be as good. Chris Henry, if he can keep his life straight(which is doubtful) WILL be a better WR than Chad Johnson .

2006-10-11 16:57:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They wouldnt be as good as they are but they wouldnt be far, some of there other recievers have been on fire especially T.J he's looking unstoppable this season

2006-10-11 15:58:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes

2006-10-11 15:47:01 · answer #6 · answered by jb 4 · 0 1

it depends they probably would cause marvin is pretty good at finding WR's i don't think they would have as good of a reciever as chad but they'ed have someone good one player don't make a team look at T.O

2006-10-11 17:07:15 · answer #7 · answered by John 3 · 0 0

its carson palmer that runs the show...they wouldve beat pitt possibly if he didnt get hurt...chad just catches the ball..palmer has to place it htere..and how are you michael d when im michael d haha

2006-10-11 15:54:26 · answer #8 · answered by Michael D 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers