English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ive been hearing this thoery alot more often. Yes, its a horrid scenario...but personally i think it may hold some weight...what do you think?

2006-10-11 08:35:07 · 13 answers · asked by stallion6539 2 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

nope, i used to but now i don't

here, grab some popcorn, and relax
http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

its a 3 hour movie, so you may not want to watch it all in one sitting

2006-10-11 08:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The questions that remain open about the attacks are not being addressed by the Bush administration. Also the way the investigation was conducted (after being fought by the Bush administration) leaves as many questions open as the conduct of the Bush administration after the demolition of the three buildings, the crash into the Pentagon and the downing of flight 93.

There are more open questions than answers and the nonchalance the Bush administration disregards those questions lead people to believe that it was staged by the Bush administration. When you ask yourself: "Who benefited the most from this?" you will come to the conclusion that it is not the Taliban or Osama or anyone else but the Bush administration and the Israelis (Which is virtually the same group).

2006-10-11 16:01:25 · answer #2 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0 1

Since watching this documentary a few weeks ago I am totally convinced that yes Bush and co. absolutely staged 9/11. I mean... at the Pentagon how come a whole plane went missing. It doesn't just vanish or burn out. Only an engine was left and how come there were two explosions?... And. And... the way the twin towers collapsed was so similiar to building being demolished by explosives...

2006-10-11 15:49:00 · answer #3 · answered by saibhe79 2 · 1 1

I think the point is that there is so much information available on both sides, that you end up finding what you want to find, and believing what you want to believe, so information which demostrates why the government might want to destroy these buildings, kill 3000 people, and create a war is important to a clear understanding.

If people become aware of the following, then 9/11 is easier to understand.

The Federal Reserve is a private company.
The IRS has no founding in law.
There is a group of very rich people which control governments, corporations, politics, secret services, education, medicine, oil, armaments, banks, media, and most of the things which affect our social lives.

The Federal Reserve is PRIVATELY OWNED
http://www.worldnewsstand.net/today/articles/fedprivatelyowned.htm

Aaron Russo's full movie
*America - From Freedom to Fascism*
http://www.poodlecrap.com/Hateliars/HL_Video1.asp?Part=0

An Illuminati Primer
http://www.rinf.com/news/nov05/illuminati.html

Rothschild/Rockefeller
The Architecture of Modern Political Power
http://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/fourthreich/rockroth.html

2006-10-12 20:28:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think you'd have to be a total idiot to give this more than half a minute's consideration as a possibility.

First of all, we've known about Al Qaeda for some time. They attacked the WTC once before, and the USS Cole, and the Khobar Towers, and Islamic extremists took over our embassy in Tehran twice, and the Pan Am flight over Lockerbie, and countless suicide bombings in Israel, and their rhetoric is clearly hostile. They took credit for it and celebrated it, and we have the videotapes of two of the pilots talking about it.

Occam's Razor says that the simplest solution is the most probable.

However, let's look at the inside job scenario. First of all, they start off with the claim that "buildings don't fall like that". Fact is, when they are supported from the outside corners, they fall exactly like that. One floor's support fails, and falls about ten feet, building up some g-force along the way, strikes the floor below, and that collapses, and it just plain snowballs. Had this been a matter of controlled charges, you'd have seen the cutting explosions at the corners of the building, but you didn't. Second, they claim that it wasn't a jet that hit the Pentagon. It was in the films I saw of it.

And bear in mind that government plans have such a high failure rate that it's inconceivable they'd attempt something this convoluted and dangerous just for some kind of political gain. As bad as Waco was, it was a screwup from start to finish.

However, let's ignore all the evidence and assume that the Islamic extremists that claim they want to kill us all are innocent, and the President who claims he wants to protect us really engineered the event that killed 3,000 people.

Obviously Bush didn't do it himself, since he's no smarter than a monkey, so I'm told, and he was busy reading books to kids at the time, so he had help. Just how much help did he have?

Well, each of the towers was over 100 floors, and if you figure it takes 1 person at least 20 minutes to plant the explosives on each floor, that's a total of 4,000 minutes, or about 66 hours, even ignoring the need to make several trips just to carry the explosives. I think they'd have needed at least a crew of four.

Then you have the control of the airplanes by remote control from the ground, that's probably two more people to install them, and two more to control two aircraft each, which may explain why one plane went down, it might have been tougher to fly them from the ground than expected.

Then you'd need at least two actors, one male and one female, for the faked 911 calls from the aircraft itself.

There might be some others, like someone to plant the flight manuals in the phony hijackers' car at Logan airport, and the occassional phony witness just to make sure the reporters got the right story, but the absolute minimum for such a conspiracy made to look like Al Qaeda did it is ten.

This is America. If that were the case, at least one of the ten would be on the talk circuit by now and have a five million dollar book deal, but they've maintained omerta for something really huge....

and yet....

Bill Clinton couldn't keep a sex act with only one other person in the room a secret, and he's the smartest man in the world.

You'd really have to be a complete moron to believe that the government was behind this one.

PS: Do a web search on Alex Jones and read what else he writes about before you believe a word he says about 9/11.

2006-10-11 15:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 0 2

Yes I think its entirely possible because of the sole reason that without 9-11 they would never had had the justification for going to war with afghanistan and iraq.Any intelligent person knows thats what they were after from the beginning. Also before 9-11 the media generally laughed at bush and portrayed him as bumbling idiot after that.well you know the rest youare with us or against us.

2006-10-11 15:41:33 · answer #6 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1 3

Watch the film TerrorStorm by Alex Jones.

2006-10-11 15:44:15 · answer #7 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1 3

Anyone taking the time to depress keys on a keyboard to present that argument ought to just go back to masturbating and leave the thinking to people with brains.

2006-10-11 15:42:46 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 1 3

That doesn't make sense. Why on earth would you even give merit to such a statement. I hope the people who started this rumor will die a miserable death.

2006-10-11 15:40:01 · answer #9 · answered by only p 6 · 1 2

It is best to look at loose change. Then look at the debunking loose change sites too. And form your own opinion.

2006-10-11 15:38:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers