I thought about this for a long time and it is a great song to represent England!
But God save the Queen should be kept as the British National Anthem though.
2006-10-11 08:19:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
You couldn't be more right - something with a bit of passion. Perhaps people representing their country may be encouraged to sing. (footballers take note)
2006-10-11 08:34:36 · answer #1 · answered by hotfeat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England would not have a countrywide anthem, whether, the national Anthem of the united kingdom will replace. Jerusalem and Land of desire and Glory at the instant are not offical anthems. on the start for specific the Queen will in basic terms replace to King and replace gender references. changing the professional national anthem could be extra difficult.
2016-10-16 02:08:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should change the songs once every 10 years perhaps along similar themes to keep things interesting, with the National Anthem unchanged.
2006-10-11 08:57:46 · answer #3 · answered by mmmporg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. God Save the Queen is dull and boring. Jerusalem has at least got a bit of life in it.
2006-10-11 08:39:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should just say God Save the Queen.
Why on earth would it be changed to Jersualem?
2006-10-11 08:50:12 · answer #5 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way!!! Its the British national anthem and thats the way it should stay
2006-10-11 09:31:53 · answer #6 · answered by karen h 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the Israelis might have something to say!
But you're right, England does need its own anthem.
2006-10-11 09:10:04 · answer #7 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i still think it should be changed from god save the queen to god save the queen by the sex pistols. awesome awesome band btw.
2006-10-11 08:22:59 · answer #8 · answered by elliott!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's a more interesting tune.
2006-10-11 08:21:37 · answer #9 · answered by langdonrjones 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋