If you had to make the choice.
2006-10-11 08:16:48 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't get it. Foley is disowned by his party and personally disgraced. He's hiding out now and will likely spend some time in court if not in jail. Clinton is a party hero who is hailed wildly when he speaks. He's paid good money to speak, spends much time on international and domestic relief work and raises billions for good causes. What's the comparison?
2006-10-11 08:24:36 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Clinton has taken down the Democratic party. It was the majority when he first took office and now it is on its way to losing another election. At least Foley took some responsibility and resigned. If Clinton had done that, Gore may have won the election of 2000 since he would have been an incumbent.
2006-10-11 19:15:30 · answer #2 · answered by L3-knightw1zard 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
In a way that's a hard one. Both are know sexual deviats. But Foley is worse, he falls into the catagory with Dem. Barney Franks and that other guy who Clinton pardoned after he was convicted of having sex with a 16 year old girl. Dang I'm sorry but I wouldn't want to be associated with either one of them. I just read where two Democrat operatives knew about Foley's er adventures as long as a year ago and shopped the story around to newspapers back then but no one wanted to print it quite yet. So much for democrats moral stand on protecting the kids.
2006-10-11 15:24:59 · answer #3 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
President Clinton hands down. At least his legacy will be noted as legitimate. The Republican Party and the antics of the Bush-Gone Wild Administration, will be known as the worst legacy in the entire historic venue of the existence of the United States of America. With recent developments; I wonder why any person who would call themselves patriotic, would continue to support this tyrannical regime. Remember President Nixon; well guess who was in his administration (Cheney and Rumsfield). They screwed up then and continue to embarrass the country.
2006-10-11 15:34:09 · answer #4 · answered by Swordfish 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be a Clinton Democrat, but I am not into girls really... Though I am not into young boys either...
2006-10-12 01:01:15 · answer #5 · answered by oksana_rossi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am an American Democratic Republican.
2006-10-11 15:31:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What exactly is a "Foley Republican" anyway? Can you explain what it means? Are you saying that all Republicans are pedophiles? Come on, now. You can't be that uneducated. So, tell us exactly what you mean? Or is this just rhetoric.
2006-10-11 15:28:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Thank God we don't have that as an only choice except in some microscopic minds. He would have been neither, he was a patriotic American, who would have been really angry at the degenerates running the government for the last four administrations.
2006-10-11 15:21:10 · answer #8 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I will always be any kind of a Democrat and never any kind of a Republican.
2006-10-11 15:19:53 · answer #9 · answered by Preacher 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Neither. I'd rather be an independent who can think for himself.
2006-10-11 15:39:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋