English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

they will conduct a focus group to discover where they stand on the issue. Then one month later they will have another one to discover where they stand on the issue.

2006-10-11 22:03:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

As always the Democrats would blame the Republicans, sort of like the pot calling the kettle black. North Korea knows that we could wipe them out at any time. The fact is that they are seeking a dialogue with the United States and they are ignoring their neighbors. It could be that we are the only ones that have been supporting them.
Communism does not breed "Plenty". Their Economy is very poor right now.

Communism is like the Army, it cannot exist without help from outside.
About that Missle. The have a long way to go before they could develop a delivery system that they would be sure would not fall back into their own back yard.

Maybe you should ask the question, why we did not Nuke them, instead of killing off more than 50.000 of our finest young men. when we were fignting them.

2006-10-11 14:42:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Think about this.....N. Korea knows that Bush is not popular right now and one of the main reasons is Iraq. Do you think Bush would really risk alienating more Americans by invading N. Korea? Of course not, we would all be screaming. So basically N. Korea understands this and they are "In our face" because they believe that we won't do anything. I hope we don't do anything, but it's Bush again picking the wrong fight.

2006-10-11 14:47:47 · answer #3 · answered by Jan G 6 · 0 1

typically its a little hard to respond when you're dead. However if you're referring to the threat of a nuke being dropped... even if there was a military conflict the US would have to re-institute the draft just to get the man power to enforce it.

It's called diplomacy for a reason. Kickin' some A** is fun to think about but costly in the terms of Amercan lives in the long run.

2006-10-11 14:40:48 · answer #4 · answered by jeffro0685 2 · 3 1

If you mean the far left, they'd be to busy blaming Bush to even notice. If you mean the far right, like yourself, they'd be to busy blaming Clinton.

If you mean us, the intelligent of this country, we'd assure at all cost that N. Korea doesn't launch another one, by any means neccessary. And one thing you failed to remember, missile interception, stupid. Nice waste of points.

2006-10-11 15:02:57 · answer #5 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1 1

Well the democrats would never let that happen because they would talk to North Korea and not just play the part of arrogant child like Bush is and ignore them.
We would never let it get that far.Now did they test a nuclear weapon when Clinton was President? I dont think so
Do you think the cause of the testing is because the US refuses to resume 6 party talks with them like they asked?
Do you think when you have a country like this where the people have been raised to believe we will attack them at any moment you should ignore them?

2006-10-11 14:37:06 · answer #6 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 3 3

Kim Jong is crazy but not stupid... The only reason he would launch is if he was about to be invaded. He knows that, no matter WHO is in power here in the US, the American people would DEMAND! he be sent to meet his ancestors. Along with every one else in his country...

2006-10-11 14:44:51 · answer #7 · answered by o_r_y_g_u_n 5 · 1 0

They'll sit down and have talks with them. It's worked so well in the past, hasn't it? I mean, they promised not to use nuclear technology to create weapons - just power. They break their promise, and the Dems just want more talks.

Diplomacy is nice if both sides are honest and willing to stick to the treaty, but once you violate it, I say we are free to kick some butt!

.

2006-10-11 14:35:55 · answer #8 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 2 3

Why didn't that jackass Bush invade N. Korea while he had the chance instead of Iraq who never had any nuclear weapons?

2006-10-11 14:38:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Wont happen, N.Korea and south would be a smolder waist land.

2006-10-11 14:40:10 · answer #10 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers