What is the king's name defeated by a small roman army because nobody dare tell him the romans were coming

Question

The king had a vastly superior force, but nobody dared tell him that the Romans were coming because he always killed anyone who gave him bad news. The romans defeated his large army. But does anyone know the name of the king?

Answer 1

Neither of those kings was alive in the Roman period.

The king you are looking for is Tigranes the Great. He was known as The King of Kings and ruled the Armenian Empire in the modern day Caucasus region in the 1st Century BC.

He was known for his ferocity and had previously executed messengers when they brought bad news of an approaching enemy.

He was so arrogant that this led to his downfall at the Battle of Tigranocerta in 69 BC. He has amassed a hugh army of several hundred thousand. These included about 50,000 cataphracts (armoured horses) and a huge rabble of 100,000-200,000 militiamen.

The small Roman legion of about 5-10,000 men feigned a retreat which Tigranes believed was real. The Romans forded a nearby river out of view of the enemy and attacked their cavalry from an unexpected angle. With the cavalry in disarray many of the horses bolted and routed through the horde of untrained fighters, killing many in the process and frightening the rest into submission.

The Romans won the battle with few casualties. Some historical texts place Roman casualties at 5 men whilst the enemy lost over 100,000. These are almost certainly highly exaggerated. But history is nearly always written by the winners.

Answer 2

I do desire that human beings could be extra sparkling approximately what they advise via 'the top of the Roman Empire'. Are you talking with regards to the 5th century end of the Western Empire (based in Italy) or the fifteenth century end of the eastern Empire (now frequently time-honored to us because of the fact the Byzantine Empire, even nonetheless the term became no longer used on the time)? i'm going to assume for the 2d that we are talking with regards to the former, because of the fact it form of feels to be a extra basic subject count. the final single situation the W Empire had in its declining years became a reluctance to flow to warfare via itself behalf. This became comined, fatally, with a reluctance to pay its mercenaries the going fee to do the battling for it. THis became somewhat real of the Goths. via the top of the W Empire, the 'Roman military' became certainly in particular a Gothic military, battling for the Romans. till, it incredibly is, it got here across that it wasn't being paid what it became confident became its due, at which factor it merely took what Rome became unwilling to grant freely. So i think of that tremendously plenty solutions your question. they only left the battlefield under a various identify.

Answer 3

He was a Greek called Offwithisead.

Answer 4

Ethelred the Unready.

And now over to docspiro, who has no sense of humour whatsoever .......

Answer 5

king james the 1st.