English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Yes. We treat zero as a number in its own right, while the zero originally developed as a "filler" or "placeholder" to distinguish numbers, like 48 and 408 or 3300 and 33.

2006-10-11 07:04:30 · answer #1 · answered by dutch_prof 4 · 0 0

NO
Zero when it was invented by Aryabhatta is same as it is today.
The first correct definition of zero was also given by him & that concept is still followed today. In Vedic maths as in early times or todays maths its meaning remains totally same.

2006-10-11 07:05:43 · answer #2 · answered by ADITYA S 2 · 0 0

no
Zero Is the same as was before, no thing. at that point it was a place holder. the same as today

2006-10-11 06:56:43 · answer #3 · answered by Democestes 3 · 0 0

i see some difference when u pointed it out particularily.
aryabhatta intoduced shunya concept and not zero
shunya means nothing
in that sense 100 means one

2006-10-14 05:09:18 · answer #4 · answered by K R 2 · 0 0

You can say.

it depends on where you place.

In limits,fits and tolerences, you can see, -0,+0

2006-10-11 09:27:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers