English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-11 06:45:43 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

19 answers

No.It's the not knowing that kills me.I think that if you don't get good news quickly then it's probably bad news.

2006-10-11 20:11:15 · answer #1 · answered by kas 2 · 1 0

When I was younger I totally misunderstood that phrase as though it meant there was no such thing as "good" news, ie there is no news which is good - all news is bad.

Not an answer I know but I thought I'd just share my stupidity with you anyway...

2006-10-11 13:55:46 · answer #2 · answered by lexxfive 2 · 0 0

To be honest, I would rather have news of any kind then no news at all - I can't stand waiting.

2006-10-11 14:37:20 · answer #3 · answered by Ally 5 · 0 0

depends if you are waiting for good news or not! But my Nan used to say this, and there is an element of truth in it!

2006-10-11 13:49:54 · answer #4 · answered by rose_merrick 7 · 0 0

No news is bad as there maybe soething going on you don't know about.
If there is good news you are told but no news is not good but maybe okay.

2006-10-11 15:47:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think no news means no one cares enough to tell you. There is always something exciting happening somewhere.

2006-10-11 13:50:31 · answer #6 · answered by tankgirl190 6 · 0 0

Most of the time, but I think it depends on the situation though.

2006-10-11 13:47:07 · answer #7 · answered by ~Kricket~ 6 · 0 0

it depends if all news is bad news!

2006-10-11 14:15:17 · answer #8 · answered by scuba chez 2 · 0 0

Almost never. No news = ignorance is bliss.

2006-10-11 13:52:25 · answer #9 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 0 0

It depends on the issue.

2006-10-11 13:49:34 · answer #10 · answered by queenmackerel 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers