I am an old political science/ history graduate and have followed conflicts around the globe for years now. That situation was blown way out of proportion by the U.S. media. The actual number of deaths was quite minor. Although I am sure Lebanese civilians would disagree. Their economy took a huge blow. But overall, the whole thing reminded me of theater. Quite melodramatic. Both Israel and Hezbollah could get an academy award for their acting in that one. It will have little impact on future conflicts in that region. I kept on telling my friends from day one that it would be over in no time. And low and behold...
2006-10-11 06:41:32 · 2 answers · asked by cannonball 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Unless the Middle East conflict escalates into open war with threat of nuclear weapons being used, Israel vs enemy-of-the-month is simply business as usual for the region.
They have been killing each other there for 10 000 years and do not need Jew vs Arab vs Christian politics to hate each other.
Proximity is enough motivation to fight, the wars there are really wars over limited real estate and resources.
Just like all wars are.
2006-10-11 07:18:03 · answer #1 · answered by aka DarthDad 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Damn....i wrote a paragraph, and then i accidentally deleted it..o well...your wrong....
2006-10-11 13:46:24 · answer #2 · answered by julean33 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋