Iraq is a mess. But that's no reason to stop. The U.S. should continue to demonstrate her Supremacy. What country should we invade next?
-One of our Latin American Servants (Colombia, Venezuela)
-Some Middle Eastern Banana Republic (Yemen, Oman)
-Some unknown country in the middle of Easter Europe (Latvia, Belarus)
-An despaired African country (Uganda, Zambia)
-Some unimportant Asian country? (Laos, Camobia, Thailand)
2006-10-11 06:26:05 · 12 answers · asked by pregunton-tonton 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh, the country your mother came from, most definitely!
2006-10-11 06:29:00 · answer #1 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraq is a mess? Hmmm...what would you call France or Russia in WW2? Wow, you'd just capitulate I'd imagine, the first time a missile or bullet whizzed by. Glad you're not fighting our battles to secure America.
Iraq is experiencing a reorganization of their political landscape, in the absence of a strong military presence. If you knew how many people died to establish most of the major states of the world, you'd probably prefer agrarian or nomadic existence and leaves for toilet paper; man is a political animal and political battles are being fought internally in Iraq, and the US is not losing there so much as the Iraqi people are. They kill each other, and blame it on our presence. It's a myopic and misinformed perspective, one very indicative of a society that had turned back the clock on progress and political transparency during the Hussein regime. Leaving does not solve ANYTHING.
If you seriously wish to consider other nations who warrant a military backhand to the mouth, I can offer you many:
a) North Korea
b) Iran
c) Sudan
d) Syria
e) Cuba
f) Thailand
All nations who are currently totalitarian, oppressive and unproductive members of the global society, or are moving in that direction. Military leadership should also be dissolved in Pakistan eventually, but only when democratic processes ensure a productive, open, capitalist and stable system there. Musharraf's leadership is the lesser evil.
South American socialist movements have turned back any servitude the South Americans may have felt toward US interests. The funny thing is, if & when those nations go broke (they will), go communist (they might), or get invaded (still a small probability), they'll come crying to the UN or the US to save their collective backsides. The Bluster from the Amazon is just that. Hot air. Scores of nations will economically rot in the next century because they're one trick ponies: OIL. Can't wait to see the day when the US buys its last drop of foreign oil, and it'll be sooner rather than later.
Supremacy is earned and maintained, not imposed. The US pays for its imports and pays for the protection of its allies and interests. It doesn't subjugate people or nations to its will unjustly, if that were the case, there would still be a US administrative body managing Iraq (which I think there still should be). America is humanity's last great hope, and I believe that, because I see the alternatives:
PUTIN
CHAVEZ
MORALES
KIM
KHAMEINI
CASTRO
ASSAD
You believe THESE men are more in tune with the progress of all of mankind and the cooperation of nations and insurance of peace? You are severely and pathologically deluded. Enjoy the fantasy.
2006-10-11 06:44:09 · answer #2 · answered by rohannesian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MEXICO of course.
1) It's cheaper than building a fence and guarding it with US forces forever.
2) 1/3 of Mexico already lives in the US so they'd love to have their homeland become part of the US.
3) We could finally get all those back taxes all the illegal immigrants have not been paying.
4) We could stop the corruption in the Mexican govt. that has been ruining their economy for years.
5) Oh and we'd get all their oil fields.
2006-10-11 06:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, sure, they are going to have to find some new place so they can sluff off the responsibility of rebuilding Iraq on to peace keeping nations and avoid the mess they have caused.
Umm...Antartica!!! Those penguins are pro-gay marriage!
Seriously, I don't know why North Korea wasn't before Iraq....and I'm anti war.
2006-10-11 06:30:31 · answer #4 · answered by elysialaw 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Pancakes Romney wins, we would be on the whims of the Israelis, so Iran, Syria, Libya, Egypt, UAE, Yemen, Turkey, in fact any Muslim worldwide places that the Israelis hate, China, a pancake turn flops, this is the style you cook dinner them.
2016-10-19 05:15:10 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok, ok, so you obviously don't like Bush. But I appreciate having a president with a set of B A L L S that will stand up and fight to keep America safe.
My guess would be North Korea and so be it. If that maniac Kim Jun Il has a nuclear weapon, he needs to be stopped...NOW!
2006-10-11 06:33:25 · answer #6 · answered by Agent99 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It has to be an easy one so Republicans can declare victory before November. How about Palau?
We could be in and out before lunch.
2006-10-11 06:31:40 · answer #7 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets use the Bush logic on this one. Korea is the biggest threat to peace with its nuclear bomb. Lets invade Canada.
2006-10-11 06:30:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Anything on the axis of evil should do..
But seriously.. they should just do us all a favour and invade themselves :P
civilly!
christo
2006-10-11 06:29:11 · answer #9 · answered by planet_guru 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why not Mexico or Canada, they are so close it would cost less.
2006-10-11 06:34:09 · answer #10 · answered by armywifetp 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋