Which of the three above do you think would win a tournament if only them three were in it????
2006-10-11 05:34:20 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Tennis
Andy Murray for sure. The other two are not natural racquet players.
2006-10-11 05:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by peeve 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Definitely Andy Murray he shows true potential while Rusedski and Henman are way past their peak unless they can go back to the top like Andre Agassi. Murray is the only other player to beat Federer other than Nadal while Henman has lost his last 7 meetings with the Swiss so that clearly states who is better.
2006-10-12 00:26:09 · answer #2 · answered by kjn 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YOU ARE ALL STUPID! TIM HENMAN IS BY FAR THE GREATEST TENNIS PLAYER THE UK HAS EVER PRODUCED.
If Andy Murray achieves a fraction of what Henman has he will be doing amazingly well.
For the past ten years Henman has consistently been in the top ten in the world, he has reached the semis in three of the grand slam events, he has won masters events and has medalled at the olympics.
He has beaten some of the all time greats (Becker, Agassi, Sampras...)
Anyone who reckons that this record is somehow second rate must know very little about tennis.
2006-10-13 05:20:03 · answer #3 · answered by ginger_cow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Andy Murray has had impressive start to his career. His ranking has soared in the past 12 months, and he recently won his first tour title, beating Roddick and Hewitt in the last 2 rounds. Impressive stuff. He looks like he has a promising career ahead of him. That said, I'd still have to say that right now Henman is still the better of the 2. He's won a number of tour titles, he's was a consistent top-tenner for a few years, and he's come pretty close to winning Wimbledon on a number of occasions.
2016-03-18 07:51:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's probably Andy Murray only cause he's young and has just started his career. Henman and Rusedski has already passed their Prime.
2006-10-11 07:07:57 · answer #5 · answered by I_Like_Clementines 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Andy Murray is currently the best overall of the three. His head-to-head rating against Henman (see http://www.atptennis.com/3/en/players/headtohead/?player1=Murray%2C+Andy&player2=henman ) is 3-1, and although he has never played Rusedski, Murray's ranking, 20, is much higher than Rusedski's ranking, 145 (see http://www.atptennis.com/3/en/players/headtohead/?player1=Murray%2C+Andy&player2=rusedski ). But in terms of strokes, of the three, Henman is the best volleyer, and Rusedski holds the fastest serve (149 mph).
2006-10-11 11:49:53 · answer #6 · answered by trumanity 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Andy Murray for sure.
He is still very young and inexperienced yet he still plays better than the other two. Henman has no big match temperament and he seems really boring.
Now that Murray has Brad Gilbert as his coach I think he will only improve.
2006-10-11 06:34:08 · answer #7 · answered by Inky Pinky Ponky 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Andy Murray, since he is on the rise, and the other two
are in the twilight stages of their careers. Andy Murray
may one day usurp Tim Henman as the best British male
player since Fred Perry.
2006-10-11 05:36:33 · answer #8 · answered by Answerer17 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Greg Rusedski.
2006-10-11 07:05:00 · answer #9 · answered by just me 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Andy Murray. Tim and Greg's best days have gone now and Andy is the one to watch.
2006-10-11 05:40:25 · answer #10 · answered by redhead 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Andy Murray at their present form, but Henman looks like he is on his way back to the top!
2006-10-12 11:34:06 · answer #11 · answered by Bo V 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋