I have been reading his book, "The Theory Of Everything."
Some of it is semi-retarted and makes no sence whatsover. IN MY OPINION!
2006-10-11 05:23:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
"""""""""
His reasons because the beginning of the universese was the work of God. But the whole history of the universe can be said to be the work of God.
(Can't make up his mind)
"""""
Now twice zero is zero, thus the universe can double its postive energy.
(Zero is'nt postive)
2006-10-11 05:34:31 · update #1
To appreciate some ones work either the reader shold have open mind or some inclination towards his fundamental theories. You dont seem to have neither. So none of us would appreciate your book if you write one.
2006-10-11 06:28:31 · answer #1 · answered by Dr M 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I concur, your manners could use some polish. Aside from the human relations issue, don't let anyone dissuade you.
Continue to study as best you can, someday you might see something no one has seen before or find some way to combine the things we already know and make some new use of it.
I haven't read any of Mr. Hawkings books, so I won't offer any opinion on them. From what little I have heard him say, I agree with some but not everything, and that's not meant to slight him.
Said differently, I don't believe everything I read. Some issues simply haven't been examined, tested and proven to the point that they can't be questioned. And some things may never be answered completely.
2006-10-11 08:01:02 · answer #2 · answered by M Hirsch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Steven Hawkings was impressive. I do disagree on his stand about the possibility of Time Travel.
A bit of trivia about him that showed how popular he was.
He was a fan of Star Trek, and so Dr Steven Hawkings became the first person that had a role to play himself. (Data wrote a program for the Holodeck to play poker against some of the greatest men of history. So Dr Hawkings was invited to play himself for an opening scene)
2006-10-11 06:00:59 · answer #3 · answered by wizebloke 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and Galileo was branded a heretic by the Catholic church for his views. I have read a couple of Mr Hawking's books and while I don't agree with all of his conclusions, I did find him articulate, intelligent and highly educated. I did not see anything retarded in his works. Be careful how you characterize people, because often you will be judged by how you judge others. If you feel his conclusions are incorrect then intelligently state your conclusions and maybe we in turn will show more decorum in how we describe you than you have shown towards Mr. Hawking.
2006-10-11 05:37:34 · answer #4 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think of that they do exist yet i think of that we ought to continuously try to touch them. Stephen Hawking is doing not something yet attempting to scare us. Hollywood has led us to have faith that extraterrestrial beings are undesirable yet for all all of us understand they may be searching for us as properly and their intentions must be harmless. who's to declare that they might have some thing valuable to us and we've some thing that they might want as properly? only think of of each and every of the opportunities that we could share.
2016-10-19 05:11:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cute attempt to try and make people react by calling someone stuck in a wheelchair, a "retard"
but a bit too obvious for anyone to fall for it
on the other hand, your own stuff looks, well, not very advanced - you're 5 years old and playing with dad's computer right? ;-)
2006-10-11 06:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by AntoineBachmann 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Go back to school and learn how to spell, retard. Mr. Hawking is quite possibly the most brilliant man born to date.
2006-10-11 07:46:28 · answer #7 · answered by legalbambino 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, I agree with you. Some of his stuff he has even had to admit that he fudged a bit to get the results he wanted. (ref: point of origin work, plugged in imaginary numbers to get the rounded curve he wanted. when the real numbers are put back in the formula goes back to a point.)
When a scientist all of a sudden becomes a celebrity you have to watch out for motives.
Of course, that's just me.
2006-10-11 05:32:20 · answer #8 · answered by Terri 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"Some of it is semi-retarted and makes no sence whatsover"
Funny, I had the same reaction after reading your question.
2006-10-11 08:09:45 · answer #9 · answered by Telesto 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Steven Hawking is a brilliant man. Whether or not you agree with him is your own decision but don't call something retarded just because you don't understand it, especially if you don't even know how to spell retarded.
2006-10-11 05:28:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋